♪ ♪ >> > > Jesse: BIG SIBLING BIDEN GOING AFTER ELON MUSK. THE DEMOCRAT BOSS AT THE FEDERAL PROFESSION PAYMENT DEMANDING TWITTER IDENTIFY ALL JOURNALISTS WHO HAD ACCESSIBILITY TO THOSE ERUPTIVE TWITTER FILES THAT SUBJECTED SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN ADDITION TO ACQUIRING THERE GRUBBY LITTLE HANDS ON INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS RELATED TO MUSK AS THEY PROBE HIS REQUISITION OF THE COMPANY. THEY ALSO NEED TO KNOW WHY PREVIOUS COMEY LACKEY JAMES BAKER GOT TERMINATED FROM THE SOCIAL MEDIA TITAN. THE LEFT-WING REPORTER WHO PUBLISHED THE FIRST BATCH OF TWITTER FILES CALLED IT AN CRAZY OVERREACH. DANA, WHO UNDERSTOOD THAT THE FTC WAS EVEN DOING ANYTHING. THEY WERE ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL FOR MINI-MADOFF. >> > > Dana: THEY WILL DO ANYTHING TO SHIELD THE LEFT. ONE OF THINGS THAT OCCURS RIGHT HERE, FIRSTLY, THE FTC, WHY IS IT ANY ONE OF YOUR SERVICES WHAT ELON MUSK THAT HAS HIS BUSINESS, IT'' S NOW A PRIVATE FIRM, WHAT HE DOES WITH HIS COMPANY.THAT ' S LITERALLY NONE OF THEIR SERVICE. > > Jesse: WHAT ARE THEY ALLEGING? > > Dana: I WEAR ' T KNOW. THEY ARE >> PROBABLY DETERMINING– WHY AM I DEFENDING HER? FOR INDIVIDUALS WHOSE E-MAILS WERE LAUNCHED MAYBE WITHOUT THEIR AUTHORIZATION. BREACH OF TRUST. WAS IT AGAINST THE POLICIES OF THE FTC? REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS CAN OFTEN SAY MEAN THINGS CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS IN THE MEDIA. THE LEFT WILL CERTAINLY FREQUENTLY UTILIZE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE MEDIA. WHEN DID WE SEE THAT? DURING THE BARACK OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. THEY OBTAINED THEIR PHONES TOUCHED AND ALSO THINGS LIKE THAT.THE LEFT WILL CERTAINLY ALWAYS GO AFTER THE MEDIA FROM THAT SIDE OF DETAILS. REPUBLICANS OBTAIN MAD BECAUSE WE SIMPLY WANT JUSTNESS. WE JUST INTENDED TO BE FAIR. > > Jesse: SHOULD REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS NOT BE SO FAIR THEN THE NEXT TIME THEY GET IN CHARGE >>, WEAPONIZE THE GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE LEFT? COURT JEANINE? > > Judge Jeanine: I DON ' T THINK THEY MUST WEAPONIZE THE GOVERNMENT> AGAINST THE LEFT. THEY SHOULD PROSECUTE THE CRIMINALS GOING AGAINST THE REGULATION. THE FACTOR THE FTC IS INVOLVED, ALLEGEDLY THEY SAY THAT WE ARE SECURING CUSTOMERS. FROM OTHER INDIVIDUAL UPCOMING IN, TWITTER FILES, FINDING OUT THAT STATED WHAT AT WHAT TIME.BASICALLY THEY ARE STATING SAFEGUARDING CONSUMERS IS WHAT THE FTC DOES. LENA CON IS SOMEONE THAT IS, WHO HAS LOW MARKS, APPARENTLY HISTORICALLY LOW NOTES THAT INDIVIDUALS IN THE FTC FOR HONESTY AS WELL AS STABILITY. SHE OVERRIDES STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, DOUBLES DOWN ON LEGAL METHODS THAT EARN HER ONE COURT ROOM REBUKE AFTER ANOTHER PERSON SO I PUT ON ' T KNOW WHY SHE WAS CHOSEN. I ' M NOT GOING TO GO THERE. RIGHT HERE ' S THE BASE LINE. TWITTER IS A PRIVATE BUSINESS. THE FTC WANTS TO KNOW WHY JAMES BAKER WAS DISCHARGED. WHY? DUE TO THE FACT THAT HE WAS WITH'THE FBI? YOU DESIRED TO MAINTAIN THE FBI AND THERE SO THEY CONTAINER DISPLAY? THE OTHER JUSTIFICATION THAT THEY ARE USING AS THEY ARE SAYING LOOK THERE WAS A CONSENT DECREE PRIOR TO ELON MUSK EVEN BOUGHT TWITTER AND WE ' VE GOT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE COMPANY HAS THE CAPABILITY TO COMPLY WITH THE$ 150 MILLION SETTLEMENT. MUSK SAYS WHAT ARE YOU DISCUSSING INQUIRY WHAT THEY WERE GOING BANKRUPT.NOW I HAVE A COMPANY AND ALSO I AM TAKING IT ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY ONCE MORE. THIS IS STANDARD LEFT IDEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND, GO AFTER THEM, TRASH THE FIRST AMENDMENT. IT DOESN ' T ISSUE. IT ' S STUNNING AND ALSO UNPLEASANT TO ANYBODY THAT IS A FIRST CHANGE LAWYER THAT THEY DARE DO THIS. > > Jesse: SHOULDN ' T THE BIDEN MANAGEMENT KISS THE GROUND THAT ELON MUSK WALK TRACK BECAUSE OF ALL HE ' S MAKING WITH GREEN TECHNOLOGY? > > Geraldo: I WEAR ' T LEARN ABOUT THAT BUT'AS A JOURNALIST FOR OVER 50 YEARS CANISTER SAY DEFINITIVELY THAT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND JOURNALISM ARE VARIOUS. THERE OUGHT TO BE A WALL SURFACE BETWEEN'THE TWO, DON ' T COME SEEKING THE PRESS REPORTER ' S NAME. THAT IS THE LAZIEST MEANS TO EXPLORE ANYTHING. YOU HAVE TO LET– MATT TAIBBI IS DEFINITELY CORRECT. WHY DO THEY REQUIRED THIS DETAILS? JUST WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS PROBE? REALLY. WHAT ' S THE END RESULT OF THIS? THAT THEY LEARN WHAT? THAT MATT TAIBBI HAD LUNCH WITH ELON MUSK? IT ' S PREPOSTEROUS, IT ' S OVERREACH.AND I GET THE CREEPS WHEN I BECOME AWARE OF IT. > > Jesse: IF SOMEONE ' S E-MAILS ARE AVAILABLE AND THEY DON ' T EVEN WORK FOR THE FIRM ANY LONGER ANY LONG OWNS THE COMPANY WHY CANISTER ' T HE PROVIDE THOSE EMAILS TO A REPORTER? > >> Tom: IT WAS WONDERFUL WHAT HE FINISHED WITH THE TWITTER DOCUMENTS. MOST OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA BEYOND AN EXCEPTIONAL LIKE IT WAS NOTHING. IT ' S A PRIVATE COMPANY, THEY CAN DO IT THEY WANT BUT I WEAR ' T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PERSONAL COMPANY.THE FACT IS THAT THEY GOT ON A MEETING TELEPHONE CALL WITH THE GOVERNMENT EVERY EARLY MORNING. THEY WERE MAKING DECISIONS BASED ON'WHAT THE BIDEN MANAGEMENT TOLD THEM TO DO.
THE OLD TWITTER. > > Jesse: IS NOT GOVERNMENT PROPERTY ANYMORE. > > Tom: MUSK IS A TROUBLE, HILARIOUS. THERE IS NO BENEFIT TO WHAT HE ' S DOING. HE INVESTED UNTOLD BILLIONS ON THIS >> BUSINESS. HE HAS SORT OF HURT HIS OWN BRAND NAME WITH THE >> LEFTIES WHO SUCHED AS HIM FOR HIS ELECTRIC AUTO BUT HE'DOESN ' T TREATMENT. THAT ' S A GUY WHO REALLY APPRECIATES COMPLIMENTARY SPEECH. I ASSUME HE ' S.
Free Discount Prescription Drug Coupons
