DISCOVERING LABORATORIES THAT BEGAN LAST
WEEK. >>> > > > FOR COVID-19 SURVIVORS, ONE SOOTHING THOUGHT HAS BEEN AT LEAST YOU MIGHT HAVE SOME RESISTANCE TO FUTURE INFECTIONS,
BUT THAT MIGHT NOT HOLD TRUE. BUT THAT MIGHT NOT BE THE INSTANCE. OUR DR. FRANK McGEORGE IS HERE WITH 2 NEW REPORTS OF PEOPLE BECOMING RE-INFECTED BELOW IN THE UNITED STATE >> > > Dr. McGeorge: YEAH, JASON. THE FIRST WELL-DOCUMENTED CASE THE FIRST WELL-DOCUMENTED INSTANCE OF A COVID REINFECTION WAS FROM HONG KONG. THERE HAVE BEEN SCATTERED REPORTS FROM VARIOUS OTHER PARTS OF THE GLOBE. IN THE MAJORITY OF THOSE CASES, THE IN A LOT OF THOSE SITUATIONS, THE 2ND INFECTION WAS NOT AS SERIOUS AS THE FIRST.NOW TWO UNITED STATE CASES ARE CHALLENGING THAT. THE FIRST UNITED STATE RECORD OF A THE FIRST UNITED STATE REPORT OF A REINFECTION WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL LANCET. THE PATIENT WAS A HEALTHY AND BALANCED 25-YEAR-OLD RESIDENT OF NEVADA
WHO EVALUATED FAVORABLE ON APRIL WHO CHECKED FAVORABLE ON APRIL 18th WITH LIGHT SIGNS, ACHING THROAT, COUGHING, HEADACHE, MILD LOOSENESS OF THE BOWELS. 9 DAYS, THE SYMPTOMS DISAPPEARED AND FOLLOWING TESTS WERE
DOWNSIDE. THEN HE BECAME SUBSTANTIAL ONCE AGAIN AS WELL AS TESTED FAVORABLE FOR COVID-19. THIS TIME, THOUGH, HIS SIGNS WERE MORE SEVERE, AND HE REQUIRED OXYGEN. THE SCIENTISTS ARE CONFIDENT THE SCIENTISTS ARE POSITIVE THIS WAS A REINFECTION NOT A RELAPSE DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE GENETICS FROM THE FIRST AND ALSO SECOND INFECTION WERE DIFFERENT. A 2ND UNITED STATE REINFECTION WAS
PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL CONTAGIOUS DISEASES. THAT CLIENT WAS A HEALTHY 42-YEAR-OLD VIRGINIA ARMED FORCE WELLNESS TREATMENT PROVIDER.ON MARCH 21st
. HE ESTABLISHED A COUGH, FEVER, HE CREATED A COUGH, HIGH TEMPERATURE, BODY ACHES, TESTED POSITIVE AND ALSO IMPROVED OVER 10 DAYS. AFTER MORE THAN A MONTH, HE WAS
REEXPOSED WHEN A PERSON IN THE REEXPOSED WHEN SOMEONE IN THE HOME DEVELOPED COVID-19 AND HAD AN ABNORMAL UPPER BODY X-RAY AND ALSO
LOW OXYGEN LEVELS. LOW OXYGEN LEVELS. HE CHECKED POSITIVE. THERE WERE DIFFERENCES IN THE INFECTIONS, SUGGESTING REINFECTION. NOW, THE REINFECTIONS
DO NOT APPEAR TO BE COMMON BUT DO NOT APPEAR TO BE COMMON BUT INCREASE QUESTIONS CONCERNING JUST HOW MUCH IMMUNITY IS GENERATED WITH AINâEUR ™ T INFECTION OR WHETHER SOMETHING
ELSE COULD BE THE CAUSE LIKE A ELSE COULD BE THE REASON LIKE A BIGGER SECONDLY DIRECT EXPOSURE.
>> > > Jason: DOES IT QUESTION REGARDING HOW EFFECTIVE A VACCINE COULD BE? >> > > Dr. McGeorge: THERE IS NO
EVIDENCE THAT THE REINFECTION EVIDENCE THAT THE REINFECTION HAPPENED BECAUSE THE VIRUS TRANSFORMED IN A MANNER THAT IT HAD THE ABILITY TO SNEAK PAST THE IMMUNE SYSTEM. IT IS REALLY HOPED THE IMMUNITY FROM A.
INJECTION WOULD BE BETTER THAN INJECTION WOULD BE BETTER THAN FROM A NATURAL INFECTION.
