WAITING FOR, COMPLETION OF MY SHOW, AND “” THE RACHEL MADDOW PROGRAM”” AND “” THE RACHEL MADDOW PROGRAM”” STARTS. STARTS. >> > > THANKS A WHOLE LOT, MY PAL. >> > > MANY THANKS A WHOLE LOT, MY FRIEND. S S >>> > > > LAST EVENING ON THE NIGHT OF >>> > > > LAST NIGHT ON THE EVENING OF THE IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES BEING THE IMPEACHMENT SHORT ARTICLES BEING CONVEYED FROM YOUR HOUSE TO THE CONVEYED FROM YOUR HOUSE TO THE SENATE FOR THE BEGIN OF THE US SENATE FOR THE BEGIN OF THE SENATE TRIAL THAT WILL CERTAINLY CHOOSE US SENATE TEST THAT WILL CERTAINLY MAKE A DECISION WHETHER OR NOT PRESIDENT TRUMP WHETHER OR NOT HEAD OF STATE TRUMP IS REMOVED FROM WORKPLACE, LAST IS REMOVED FROM OFFICE, LAST NIGHT THE BOARDS THAT NIGHT THE BOARDS THAT PERFORMED THE IMPEACHMENT PERFORMED THE IMPEACHMENT EXAMINATION ADDED A PERK EXAMINATION ADDED A BONUS ROUND TO THE PRODUCTS THAT THEY ROUND TO THE PRODUCTS THAT THEY INTENDED TO CONVEY TO THE SENATE. PLANNED TO COMMUNICATE TO THE SENATE. ALONGSIDE THE SHORT ARTICLES OF ALONGSIDE THE WRITE-UPS OF IMPEACHMENT, THEY ADDED NEW IMPEACHMENT, THEY INCLUDED NEW EVIDENCE.EVIDENCE.
THESE FRESHLY GOT DOCUMENTS THESE RECENTLY ACQUIRED FILES AND ALSO TEXT MESSAGES FROM A MALE AS WELL AS TEXT FROM A GUY NAMED LEV PARNAS. CALLED LEV PARNAS. LEV PARNAS IS A SOVIET-BORN, LEV PARNAS IS A SOVIET-BORN, RUSSIAN-SPEAKING U.S. PERSON RUSSIAN-SPEAKING UNITED STATE CITIZEN THAT FUNCTIONED CLOSELY WITH THAT FUNCTIONED CLOSELY WITH HEAD OF STATE TRUMP’S PERSONAL HEAD OF STATE TRUMP’S PERSONAL LAWYER RUDY GIULIANI ON THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE RUDY GIULIANI ON THE PLAN IN UKRAINE, FOR WHICH THE SCHEME IN UKRAINE, FOR WHICH THE PRESIDENT HAS NOBODY YOU PRESIDENT HAS NOBODY YOU IMPEACHED.IMPEACHED.
TO STRESS UKRAINE ANNOUNCING TO STRESS UKRAINE ANNOUNCING INVESTIGATION OF JOE BIDEN, THE INVESTIGATION OF JOE BIDEN, THE CONCURRENT USAGE OF MILITARY HELP, CONCURRENT USE ARMED FORCE AID, An AND ALSO CHECK OUTS WITH U.S. An AND CHECK OUTS WITH U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AS WELL AS OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AS WELL AS OTHER THINGS THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT POINTS THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT SERIOUSLY WANTED, BASICALLY’S SERIOUSLY DESIRED, BASICALLY’S NATION COUNTRY KUDGELS.KUDGELS.
TONIGHT THE ARTICLES OF TONIGHT THE SHORT ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT HAVE BEEN STROLLED IMPEACHMENT HAVE BEEN WALKED OVER, ACTUALLY BASICALLY RIGHT OVER, ACTUALLY BASICALLY RIGHT AS THAT WAS HAPPENING, THE AS THAT WAS HAPPENING, THE IMPEACHMENT BOARDS IN THE IMPEACHMENT COMMITTEES IN THE HOUSE, SIMULTANEOUSLY TO THIS RESIDENCE, SIMULTANEOUSLY TO THIS MOMENT, RELEASED SOME ADDITIONAL MOMENT, RELEASED SOME ADDITIONAL PHONE DOCUMENTS FROM MR. PARNAS, PHONE DOCUMENTS FROM MR. PARNAS, WHICH HAVE EXPOSED YET FURTHER WHICH HAVE REVEALED YET FURTHER INFO ABOUT THAT WAS INFO ABOUT THAT WAS INVOLVED IN THIS SYSTEM AND HOW INVOLVED IN THIS SYSTEM AND HOW IT WORKED.IT WORKED.
WELL, TODAY IN NEW YORK CITY CITY I WELL, TODAY IN NEW YORK CITY I MET WITH LEV PARNAS, AND ALSO WITH MET WITH LEV PARNAS, AND ALSO WITH HIS ATTORNEY JOSEPH BONDI. HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPH BONDI. TONIGHT WE’RE GOING TO BRENT TONIGHT WE’RE GOING TO BRENT THIS EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW. THIS EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW. MR. PARNAS HAS NEVER EVER TALKED IN A MR. PARNAS HAS NEVER TALKED IN A TELEVISED INTERVIEW. TELEVISED MEETING. HE’S NOT SPOKEN TO REPORTERS AT HE’S NOT SPOKEN TO REPORTERS IN ANY WAY SINCE HIS NAME APPEARED IN ALL BECAUSE HIS NAME EMERGED TOGETHER WITH A DETRACTION AND ALSO COMBINATION WITH A DETRACTION AND ALSO BECAUSE HE WAS JAILED ON OCTOBER SINCE HE WAS JAILED ON OCTOBER 9th, WITH A ONE-WAY TICKET AT 9th, WITH A ONE-WAY TICKET AT DULLES FLIGHT TERMINAL. DULLES AIRPORT. HE WAS CHARGED WITH FEDERAL HE WAS CHARGED WITH FEDERAL FELONY COUNTS FOR CHANNELING FELONY COUNTS FOR FUNNELING ILLEGAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ILLEGAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN CANDIDATES AND REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN CANDIDATES AND CAMPAIGNS. CAMPAIGNS. MR. PARNAS IS UNDER INDICTMENT, MR. PARNAS IS UNDER INDICTMENT, AWAITING TRIAL. AWAITING TEST. HE HAS PLED NOT GUILTY. HE HAS PLED NOT GUILTY. HE ACCEPTED TALK TO ME TODAY HE CONSENTED TO SPEAK TO ME TODAY ON THE CONDITION THAT HIS ON THE CONDITION THAT HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, JOSEPH BONDI, WOULD BE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, JOSEPH BONDI, WOULD BE SEATED ALONGSIDE HIM THROUGHOUT SEATED ALONGSIDE HIM THROUGHOUT THE INTERVIEW.THE MEETING.
THAT’S A CONDITION I ACCEPTED. THAT’S A CONDITION I CONCURRED TO. TO BE HONEST, BECAUSE I CONSENTED TO BE HONEST, SINCE I ACCEPTED THAT PROBLEM, I TOTALLY TO THAT PROBLEM, I FULLY EXPECTED THAT IT WOULD BE MR. EXPECTED THAT IT WOULD BE MR. BONDI, THE ATTORNEY, WHO DID A LOT OF BONDI, THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, WHO DID THE MAJORITY OF THE SPEAKING, BUT IT DID NOT OF THE CHATTING, BUT IT DID NOT WORK OUT IN THIS WAY. WORK OUT THIS WAY. MR. PARNAS, AS YOU SEE RIGHT HERE, HE MR. PARNAS, AS YOU SEE HERE, HE IS DEFINITELY RIGHT HERE TO IS DEFINITELY RIGHT HERE TO HERE, HE IS DEFINITELY HERE TO HERE, HE IS DEFINITELY RIGHT HERE T PROMOTE HIMSELF, AND ALSO IS EVEN MORE PROMOTE HIMSELF, AND ALSO IS MORE THAN CAPABLE OF DOING SO.THAN CAPABLE
OF DOING SO. HE AS WELL AS HIS LAWYER HAVE MADE HE AND HIS LAWYER HAVE MADE CLEAR IN CURRENT DAYS AND ALSO WEEKS CLEAR IN CURRENT DAYS AND ALSO WEEKS THAT LEV PARNAS DOES WISH TO THAT LEV PARNAS DOES WISH TO BEAR WITNESS THE IMPEACHMENT TESTIFY TO THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION. EXAMINATION. THAT STATED, I CAN’T STRESS SUFFICIENT THAT CLAIMED, I CAN’T EMPHASIZES SUFFICIENT THAT HE RIGHT NOW IS OUT ON BOND THAT HE NOW IS OUT ON BOND AWAITING TEST IN FEDERAL COURT AWAITING TRIAL IN FEDERAL COURT ON SERIOUS FELONY CHARGES.ON SERIOUS FELONY COSTS. SO THE CHOICE FOR HIM TO DO SO THE CHOICE FOR HIM TO DO THIS MEETING WITH ME TODAY IS THIS INTERVIEW WITH ME TODAY IS EXTREMELY UNUSUAL. EXTREMELY UNUSUAL. PEOPLE IN THAT SCENARIO, IN PEOPLE BECAUSE CIRCUMSTANCE, IN TERMS OF FEDERAL FELONY CHARGES, STIPULATIONS OF FEDERAL FELONY CHARGES, DON’T GENERALLY DO MEDIA DON’T GENERALLY DO MEDIA INTERVIEWS, BUT THEY CONSENTED TO INTERVIEWS, BUT THEY ACCEPTED TAKE A SEAT WITH ME TODAY, AND WE TAKE A SEAT WITH ME TODAY, AND WE DID IT. DID IT. LET’S SOLVE TO IT. LET’S SOLVE TO IT. I WILL TELL YOU IN ADVANCEMENT, TO I WILL CERTAINLY INFORM YOU IN BREAKTHROUGH, TO SET THE STAGE, IN THIS SET THE PHASE, IN THIS MEETING, YOU WILL HEAR LEV MEETING, YOU WILL LISTEN TO LEV PARNAS MAKE SOME BOMBSHELL PARNAS MAKE SOME BOMBSHELL ASSERTIONS ABOUT THE INVOLVEMENT ASSERTIONS REGARDING THE INVOLVEMENT AND EXPERTISE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP AND ALSO EXPERTISES OF HEAD OF STATE TRUMP AS WELL AS VICE HEAD OF STATE MIKE PENCE IN AND VICE PRESIDENT MIKE PENCE IN THE UKRAINE SCANDAL.THE UKRAINE RUMOR. HE WILL CERTAINLY MAKE A SPECIFIC HE WILL CERTAINLY MAKE A SPECIFIC CLAIMS ABOUT THE PRESIDENT’S CLAIMS ABOUT THE PRESIDENT’S UNIQUE FUNCTION IN HOLDING UP THE UNIQUE FUNCTION IN STANDING UP THE UNITED STATE HELP TO UKRAINE AS AN U.S. HELP TO UKRAINE AS AN ADDITIONAL BAR OF STRESS ADDITIONAL LEVER OF STRESS AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. YOU WILL ALSO HEAR RATHER YOU WILL ALSO LISTEN TO FAIRLY SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS BY MR.EXPLICIT ALLEGATIONS BY MR. PARNAS ABOUT ATTORNEY GENERAL PARNAS ABOUT LAWYER GENERAL WILLIAM BARR. WILLIAM BARR. HE LIKEWISE MAKES SOME ALLEGATIONS HE ADDITIONALLY MAKES SOME ALLEGATIONS ABOUT SEVERAL OTHER MEMBERS OF ABOUT SEVERAL OTHER MEMBERS OF THE CUPBOARD. THE CUPBOARD. WE’LL SPEAK ABOUT SEVERAL OF THOSE WE’LL SPEAK ABOUT SOME OF THOSE TONIGHT, AS WELL AS WE’RE SAVING SOME TONIGHT, AND WE’RE CONSERVING SOME TO SPEAK ABOUT TOMORROW SO WE CONTAINER TO DISCUSS TOMORROW SO WE CANISTER DO SOME ADDITIONAL COVERAGE DO SOME ADDITIONAL REPORTING AROUND THEM. AROUND THEM. ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, AS MR. IN ADDITION TO EVERY ONE OF THAT, AS MR. PARNAS MAKES PENALTYAT THE TOP O PARNAS MAKES PENALTYAT THE TOP O INTERVIEW, HE NOSE THAT IN INTERVIEW, HE NOSE THAT ALONG WITH EVERY ONE OF THE IT ENHANCEMENT TO ALL OF THE IT EVIDENCE, HE STILL HAS YET MORE PROOF, HE STILL HAS YET MORE TO SHARE. TO SHARE. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. RIGHT HERE WITH GO. BELOW WITH GO. >>> > > > MR. PARNAS, MR. BONDI,>> THANK > > > MR. PARNAS, MR. BONDI, MANY THANKS BOTH FOR CONCURS TO DO THIS. YOU BOTH FOR AGREES TO DO THIS.I KNOW THIS IS A LEAP OF TRUST I UNDERSTAND THIS IS A JUMP OF DEPEND ON TO SPEAK PUSHILY. TO TALK PUSHILY. MANY THANKS TO BOTH OF YOU FOR AGREES MANY THANKS TO BOTH OF YOU FOR AGREES TO DO IT. TO DO IT. >> > > THANKS FOR HAVING US RIGHT HERE. >> > > MANY THANKS FOR HAVING United States RIGHT HERE. >> > > THANK YOU >>. >>> > > THANK YOU. > > > LET ME ASK >>> YOU INITIALLY, LEV, > > > LET ME ASK YOU FIRST, LEV, DID YOU UNDERSTAND THESE PRODUCTS DID YOU KNOW THESE MATERIALS WOULD BE LAUNCHED PUBLICLY LAST WOULD BE LAUNCHED PUBLICLY LAST NIGHT? NIGHT? IT’S LANDED WITH QUITE A SPRINKLE. IT’S LANDED WITH QUITE A DASH. IT’S VERY INTRIGUING PRODUCT. IT’S REALLY PROVOCATIVE MATERIAL. DID YOU RECOGNIZE IT WOULD BE MADE DID YOU RECOGNIZE IT WOULD BE MADE PUBLIC? PUBLIC? >> > > NO, I DIDN’T. > > NO, I DIDN’T. YES, IT WAS AN UNBELIEVABLE DAY. INDEED, IT WAS AN EXTRAORDINARY DAY. IT WAS A GODSEND WITH JOE’S HELP IT WAS A BLESSING WITH JOE’S
AID TO OBTAIN THAT IN TIME.TO OBTAIN THAT IN TIME. WE DIDN’T THINK WE WOULD MAKE WE DIDN’T THINK WE WOULD MAKE IT. IT. WE KEPT UP TO LOOK 2:00 IN THE WE KEPT UP TO LOOK 2:00 IN THE EARLY MORNING TO SEND INFORMATION. >> MORNING TO SEND OUT INFORMATION. >> > > WHAT WAS THE DEADLINE. >> > > WHAT WAS THE DUE DATE. > >> THE DUE DATE WAS TRYING TO > > THE TARGET DATE WAS LOOKING TO SAY IT TOLE INTEL CLEANSE SAY IT TOLE INTEL CLEANSE BOARD. COMMITTEE. WITH THE POST GOES THE DOCUMENT WITH THE WRITE-UP GOES THE RECORD S WE HAD FACTOR TO BELIEVE S WE HAD FACTOR TO BELIEVE CERTAIN PIECES WOULD BE PUT INTO PARTICULAR ITEMS WOULD BE TAKE INTO THE GENERAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT. THE GENERAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT. WE SIMPLY WEREUNCERTAIN WHEN THAT WE SIMPLY WEREN’T CERTAIN WHEN THAT WOULD BE, AND ALSO WE HAD NO IDEA WOULD BE, AS WELL AS WE HAD NO IDEA WHAT IT WOULD BE.WHAT IT WOULD
BE. >> > > IN REGARDS TO WHAT THEY HAVE >> > > IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY HAVE REAT LEASTED OPENLY– SOME REAT LEASTED PUBLICLY– SOME WAS HELD BACK, BUT IN TERMS OF WAS KEPT BACK, BUT IN TERMS OF WHAT WE HAVE SEEN PUBLICLY, DOES WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OPENLY, DOES IT ALL LOOK AUTHENTIC? EVERYTHING APPEARANCE AUTHENTIC? DOES ANY ONE OF IT SEEM DOCTORED? DOES ANY ONE OF IT SEEM DOCTORED? IN REGARDS TO WHAT YOU HANDED IN REGARDS TO WHAT YOU HANDED OVER. OVER. >> > > YES. >> > > YES. >> > > ABSOLUTELY >>. > > DEFINITELY. > > ARE YOU STILL PUTTING > > ARE YOU STILL PLACING TOGETHER EVEN MORE INFORMATION TO TOGETHER MORE INFORMATION TO GIVE TO CONGRESS, OR DO YOU FEEL PROVIDE TO CONGRESS, OR DO YOU FEEL LIKE THE DEADLINE HAS PASSED? LIKE THE DUE DATE HAS PASSED? >> > > WE’LL CONTINUE MAKING >> > > WE’LL CONTINUE PRODUCTION MANUFACTURINGS, AS WE OBTAIN PRODUCTS PRODUCTIONS, AS WE GET PRODUCTS FROM SOUTHERN DISTRICT AND ALSO FROM SOUTHERN DISTRICT AND ALSO ANYTHING WE CONTAINER POSSIBLY DISCOVER ON ANYTHING WE CAN POTENTIALLY FIND ON OUR OWN, THROUGH THE CLOUD OR OUR OWN, THROUGH THE CLOUD OR WHATEVER IT MAY BE, WE’LL WHATEVER IT MAY BE, WE’LL REMAIN TO PRODUCE THINGS UP UNTIL CONTINUE TO GENERATE POINTS TILL WE’RE TOLD NOT TO.WE’RE TOLD NOT TO. >> > > MR. PARNAS, WHY DO YOU WANT >> > > MR. PARNAS, WHY DO YOU WISHED TO TESTIFIED? TO TESTIFIED? >> > > I WISH TO GET THE FACT OUT. >> > > I INTEND TO GET THE FACT OUT. I BELIEVE IT is necessary FOR THE I THINK IT is necessary FOR THE NATION. COUNTRY. I ASSUME IT is necessary FOR ME. I THINK IT’S CRUCIAL FOR ME. I BELIEVE IT is very important FOR THE I THINK IT’S CRUCIAL FOR THE GLOBE TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WORLD TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT TRANSPIRED, BECAUSE THERE’S A TRANSPIRED, BECAUSE THERE’S A GREAT DEAL OF DETAILS THAT ARE BEING GREAT DEAL OF DETAILS THAT ARE BEING SAID THAT ARE NOT ACCURATE. CLAIMED THAT ARE NOT EXACT. I SIMPLY INTENDED TO SEE TO IT THAT I JUST WANT TO SEE TO IT THAT THEY ARE ACCURATE. THEY ARE ACCURATE. POINTS HAPPENED THAT NEED TO GET THINGS OCCURRED THAT NEED TO OBTAIN OUT, AND ALSO I THINK THE WORLD NEEDS OUT, AS WELL AS I ASSUME THE GLOBE NEEDS TO KNOW. TO KNOW.
>>> > > > WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS THE >>> > > > WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS THE MAJOR INACCURACY OR MAIN LIE KEY ERROR OR KEY LIE THAT’S BEING INFORMED THAT YOU FEEL THAT’S BEING INFORMED THAT YOU FEEL LIKE YOU CANISTER CORRECT. LIKE YOU CONTAINER CORRECT. >> > > THAT THE HEAD OF STATE DID KNOW >> > > THAT THE HEAD OF STATE DID KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON. WHAT WAS GOING ON. HEAD OF STATE TRUMP KNEW EXACTLY PRESIDENT TRUMP KNEW EXACTLY WHAT WAS GOING ON. WHAT WAS GOING ON. HE RECOGNIZED ALL MY HE WAS CONSCIOUS OF ALL MY MOVEMENTS.MOVEMENTS.
I WOULDN’T DO ANYTHING WITHOUT I WOULDN’T DO ANYTHING WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF RUDY GIULIANI OR THE CONSENT OF RUDY GIULIANI OR THE PRESIDENT. THE HEAD OF STATE. I HAVE NO INTENT, NO FACTOR TO I HAVE NO INTENT, NO REASON TO TALK TO ANY OF THESE AUTHORITIES. SPEAK WITH ANY ONE OF THESE OFFICIALS. THEY HAVE NO FACTOR TO SPEAK WITH THEY HAVE NO REASON TO SPEAK TO ME. ME. WHY WOULD PRESIDENTS ZELENSKY WHY WOULD PRESIDENTS ZELENSKY INNER CIRCLE OR PREACHER– OR INNER CIRCLE OR PREACHER– OR PRESIDENT POROSHENKO MEET WITH PRESIDENT POROSHENKO MEET ME. ME. THAT AM I? WHO AM I? THEY WERE TOLD TO MEET ME. THEY WERE TOLD TO CONSULT WITH ME. THAT’S THE SECRET THEY WERE THAT’S THE KEY THEY WERE TRYING TO KEEP.TRYING TO MAINTAIN. I WAS ON THE GROUND DOING THEIR I GOT ON THE GROUND DOING THEIR FUNCTION. WORK. >>> > > > IN TERMS OF THE HEAD OF STATE >>> > > > IN TERMS OF THE HEAD OF STATE AS WELL AS WHAT HE HAS ACTUALLY STATED REGARDING YOU, AND ALSO WHAT HE HAS STATED CONCERNING YOU, HE STATED ABOUT YOU AND ALSO FROM IGOR HE SAID ABOUT YOU AND ALSO FROM IGOR FRUMEN, I DON’T KNOW THOSE FRUMEN, I DON’T KNOW THOSE GENTLEMEN, NO KNOW WHAT THEY DO. GENTS, NO KNOW WHAT THEY DO. YOU’RE SAYING THAT WAS NOT A YOU’RE STATING THAT WAS NOT A TRUE DECLARATION? TRUE STATEMENT? >> > > HE EXISTED. > > HE EXISTED. WHEN YOU CLAIM FRIENDS, ME AS WELL AS HIM WHEN YOU STATE PALS, ME AS WELL AS HIM DIDN’T EAT HOT DOGS TOGETHER. DIDN’T EAT HOT PET DOGS WITH EACH OTHER. I INTERACTED WITH HIM AS A GREAT DEAL I INTERACTED WITH HIM AS A GREAT DEAL OF OCCASIONS. OF EVENTS. WE HAD ONE-ON-ONE CONVERSATIONS WE HAD ONE-ON-ONE CONVERSATIONS AT ROUNDTABLES. AT ROUNDTABLES. BASICALLY I WAS– FOROUR FIVE BASICALLY I WAS– FOROUR 5 DAYS OUT OF THE WEEK I REMAINED IN DAYS OUT OF THE WEEK I REMAINED IN CONSISTENT CALL WITH HIM.CONSTANT CONTACT WITH HIM. I WAS WITH RUDY WHEN HE WOULD I WAS WITH RUDY WHEN HE WOULD SPEAK TO THE PRESIDENT, LOTS SPEAK WITH THE PRESIDENT, LOTS OF TIMES. OF TIMES. I SUGGEST, SO IT’S SIMPLY LUDICROUSEW I INDICATE, SO IT’S JUST LUDICROUSEW >> > > HOW DID YOU KNOW RUDY WAS ON >> > > HOW DID YOU KNOW RUDY WAS ON THE PHONE WITH THE HEAD OF STATE? THE PHONE WITH THE PRESIDENT? WAS IT ON SPEAKER PHONE? WAS IT ON SPEAKERPHONE? >> > > IT WOULD BE SEVER TIMES ON >> > > IT WOULD BE SEVER TIMES ON SPEAKERPHONE.SPEAKERPHONE.
HE WOULD BEGINNING THE CONVERSATION, HE WOULD BEGIN THE DISCUSSION, TAKE IT OFF, AND THEN GO TAKE IT OFF, AND AFTERWARDS GO ELSEWHERE TO TALK TO HIM. SOMEPLACE ELSE TO SPEAK TO HIM. A GREAT DEAL OF TIMES IT WAS ON THE A WHOLE LOT OF TIMES IT WAS ON THE GOLF TRAINING COURSE WHEN WE WERE GOLF GOLF LINKS WHEN WE WERE GOLFING TOGETHER. WITH EACH OTHER. I SPECIFICALLY REMEMBER DURING THE I PARTICULARLY BEAR IN MIND DURING THE MUELLER TIME THAT RUDY STATED MUELLER TIME THAT RUDY CLAIMED SOMETHING THAT WAS GETTING OF SOMETHING THAT WAS SECURING OF CONTEXT AND ALSO HE WAS CREAMING AT CONTEXT AND HE WAS CREAMING AT HIM SO LOUD. HIM SO LOUD. THAT’S WHEN I SAW THE THAT’S WHEN I ENJOYED THE TESTIMONY, I COULD UNDERSTAND TESTIMONY, I COULD UNDERSTAND THAT YOU CAN’T HEAR PRESIDENT THAT YOU CAN’T LISTEN TO HEAD OF STATE TRUMP TALKING TO– LIKE I HEARD TRUMP TALKING TO– LIKE I LISTENED TO HIM SEVERAL TIMES WHEN HE WAS HIM SEVERAL TIMES WHEN HE WAS WITH RUDY.WITH RUDY.
> > BECAUSE HE >> TALKS LOUDLY ON >> > > DUE TO THE FACT THAT HE TALKS NOISALLY ON THE PHONE? THE PHONE? >> > > VERY LOUDLY >>. >>> > > VERY LOUDLY. > > > WHEN YOU CLAIM THE PRESIDENT > >> > WHEN YOU CLAIM THE HEAD OF STATE KNEW ABOUT YOUR MOTIONS AND KNEW REGARDING YOUR MOVEMENTS AND ALSO WHAT YOU WERE DOING, ARE YOU WHAT YOU WERE DOING, ARE YOU STATING ESPECIALLY, AS WELL AS I WANT STATING SPECIFICALLY, AND I WANT TO DRILL DOWN ON THAT, THAT THE TO DRILL DOWN ON THAT, THAT THE PRESIDENT UNDERSTOOD YOU AS WELL AS MR. HEAD OF STATE WAS AWARE YOU AND ALSO MR. GIULIANI WERE DEALING WITH THIS GIULIANI WERE WORKING ON THIS EFFORT IN UKRAINE TO BASICALLY EFFORT IN UKRAINE TO BASICALLY HURT JOE BIDEN’S POLITICAL HURT JOE BIDEN’S POLITICAL OCCUPATION? OCCUPATION? HE RECOGNIZED THAT? HE RECOGNIZED THAT? >> > > IT WAS EVERYTHING ABOUT JOE BIDEN, >> > > IT WAS EVERYTHING ABOUT JOE BIDEN, SEEKER BIDEN, AND RUDY HAD A HUNTER BIDEN, AND RUDY HAD A PERSONAL THING WITH THE MANAFORT PERSONAL THING WITH THE MANAFORT STUFF, THE BLACK LEDGER.STUFF, THE BLACK JOURNAL. THAT WAS ANOTHER PERSON THING THEY WERE THAT WAS ANOTHER POINT THEY WERE LOOKING INTO, BUT IT WAS NEVER LOOKING INTO, BUT IT WAS NEVER ABOUT CORRUPTION. REGARDING CORRUPTION. IT WAS IT PURELY REGARDING BURRIS IT WAS IT STRICTLY ABOUT BURRIS MA, WHICH INCLUDED HUNTER BIDEN MA, WHICH INCLUDED HUNTER BIDEN AS WELL AS JOE BIDEN. AND ALSO JOE BIDEN. >>> > > > PURELY CONCERNING JOE BIDEN, >>> > > > PURELY CONCERNING JOE BIDEN, SEEKER BIDEN. SEEKER BIDEN. >>> > > > IN TERMS OF THE >>> PARTICIPATION, > > > IN TERMS OF THE INVOLVEMENT, MR. PARNAS WENT OUT TO ASSERT MR. PARNAS HEADED OUT TO ASSERT THAT NOT JUST WAS PRESIDENT THAT NOT ONLY WAS PRESIDENT TRUMP FAMILIAR WITH WHAT HE AND ALSO MR. TRUMP AWARE OF WHAT HE AND ALSO MR. GIULIANI WERE DOING ON HIS GIULIANI WERE DOING ON HIS BEHALF IN UKRAINE, TRY TO SAY BEHALF IN UKRAINE, TRY TO SAY GIN UP THIS INVESTIGATION TO GIN UP THIS INVESTIGATION TO PAIN JOE BIDEN, MR. PARNAS STATES HURT JOE BIDEN, MR. PARNAS SAYS THAT THE REALITY THAT HE WAS THAT THE REALITY THAT HE WAS HELPING HEAD OF STATE TRUMP IS A HELPING PRESIDENT TRUMP IS A POINT THAT WAS MADE CLEARLY POINT THAT WAS MADE EXPLICITLY OVER AND ALSO OVER ONCE MORE IN A VERY OVER AS WELL AS OVER ONCE MORE IN A REALLY OFFICIAL MEANS, IN HIS TRANSACTIONS IN FORMAL WAY, IN HIS NEGOTIATIONS IN HIS MEETINGS IN UKRAINE.HIS MEETINGS
IN UKRAINE. YOUR LAWYER INFORMED THE FEDERAL YOUR ATTORNEY INFORMED THE FEDERAL COURT IN NEW YORK THAT YOU WERE COURT IN NEW YORK CITY THAT YOU WERE BOTH RUDY GIULIANI’S CUSTOMERS AND ALSO BOTH RUDY GIULIANI’S CLIENTS AS WELL AS YOU WERE BENEFITING MR. YOU WERE BENEFITING MR. GIULIANI IN HIS ABILITY AS GIULIANI IN HIS ABILITY AS PERSONAL ATTORNEY TO THE INDIVIDUAL LAWYER TO THE PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. >> > > CORRECT >>. >> > > CORRECT. > > WHICH, BY THE >> MEANS THE > > WHICH, INCIDENTALLY THE TRANSTIFF PROPERTY, MAKES IT TRANSTIFF HOME, MAKES IT APPEAR LIKE UMP WORKING FOR THE SEEM LIKE UMP WORKING FOR THE HEAD OF STATE AS PART OF THIS LEGAL HEAD OF STATE AS COMPONENT OF THIS LEGAL DEFENSE. DEFENSE. >> > > YES, DEFINITELY >>. >> > > YES, DEFINITELY. > > >> DID ANYBODY IN THE U.S. > > DID ANY PERSON IN THE UNITED STATE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR RUDY GIULIANI GOVERNMENT OR RUDY GIULIANI ACTUALLY CONVEYED TO UKRAINE ACTUALLY CONVEYED TO UKRAINE OFFICIALS THAT YOU WERE THERE AS AUTHORITIES THAT YOU EXISTED AS A REP? An AGENT? >> >
>> > DEFINITELY. > > ABSOLUTELY. TO EVERY AUTHORITIES, I PUT RUDY ON TO EACH AUTHORITIES, I PUT RUDY ON THE PHONE WITH THE MINUTE TERSE THE PHONE WITH THE MIN TERSE SEVERAL TIMES. SEVERAL TIMES. EVAN, YURI LUTSENKO TEST TIME, EVAN, YURI LUTSENKO TEST TIME, THE TEERNG. THE TEERNG. FIRST I SAID I’M HERE ON PART FIRST I STATED I’M HERE IN SUPPORT OF RUDY GIULIANI AND ALSO THE OF RUDY GIULIANI AS WELL AS THE HEAD OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO PUT ON I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO PUT ON YOU SPEAKER PHONE TO VERIFY HIM. YOU SPEAKERPHONE TO CONFIRM HIM. RUDY CONFIRMED BASICALLY THAT WE RUDY CONFIRMED BASICALLY THAT WE WERE THERE ON BEHALF OF THE WERE THERE ON PART OF THE HEAD OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. >> > > THAT YOU WERE THERE TO SPEAK >> > > THAT YOU EXISTED TO TALK IN SUPPORT OF HEAD OF STATE TRUMP. IN SUPPORT OF HEAD OF STATE TRUMP. >> > > YES, THOSE SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS. >> > > YES, THOSE EXACT RECORDS.
>>> > > > WHEN HE EVALUATING TAKING >>> > > > WHEN HE EVALUATING TAKING MEETINGS TO ADVANCE THIS PLAN, MEETINGS TO BREAKTHROUGH THIS PLAN, TAKING CONFERENCES WITH VARIOUS TAKING CONFERENCES WITH NUMEROUS GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES IN UKRAINE, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES IN UKRAINE, HE CLAIMED IT WAS A REGULAR HE CLAIMED IT WAS A NORMAL EVENT, THE METHOD THE CONFERENCES OCCURRENCE, THE MEANS THE CONFERENCES STARTED. BEGUN. HE WOULD PUT RUDY GIULIANI ON HE WOULD PUT RUDY GIULIANI ON PHONE, ON THE SPEAKERPHONE IN PHONE, ON THE SPEAKER PHONE IN THE SPACE, AND HE WOULD SAY THE SPACE, AND ALSO HE WOULD SAY CLEARLY, MR.GIULIANI WOULD CLEARLY, MR. GIULIANI WOULD SAY CLEARLY THAT AS THE SAY CLEARLY THAT AS THE HEAD OF STATE’S PERSONAL ATTORNEY HEAD OF STATE’S PERSONAL LAWYER THAT THEY WOULD AFFIRM THAT LEV THAT THEY WOULD AFFIRM THAT LEV PARNAS WAS AT THAT CONFERENCE TO PARNAS WAS AT THAT MEETING TO TALK IN SUPPORT OF THE HEAD OF STATE SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP. >>> > > > IN MIGHT OF >>> LAST YEAR, MAY OF > > > IN MAY OF IN 2015, MIGHT OF 2019, MR. GIULIANI BEGAN 2019, MR. GIULIANI STARTED SPEAKING TO REPORTERS ABOUT TALKING TO REPORTERS ABOUT HIS PLANS TO TRAVELING HIM REALLY HIS INTENDS TO TRAVELING HIM QUITE TO UKRAINE TO SHOT TO EMPLOY MUCH TO UKRAINE TO SHOT TO GET THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT’S THE UKRAINIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S ASSISTANCE TO HELP TO SHOT TO OBTAIN SUPPORT TO AID TO SHOT TO OBTAIN THEM TO INTRODUCE EXAMINATIONS THEM TO ANNOUNCE INVESTIGATIONS RIGHT INTO VICE HEAD OF STATE BIDEN, INTO VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE EXTREMELY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT WOULD BE VERY USEFUL TO HIS CLIENT.HELPFUL TO HIS CLIENT
. THE RESULTING FIRESTORM OF THE RESULTING FIRESTORM OF OBJECTION, MR. GIULIANI’S JOURNEY OBJECTION, MR. GIULIANI’S TRIP WAS CALLED OFF IN MIGHT. WAS CALLED OFF IN MAY. WHEN HE CANCELLED THE TRIP, MR. WHEN HE ABORTED THE TRIP, MR.GIULIANI MADE PUBLIC STATEMENTS GIULIANI MADE PUBLIC STATEMENTS CRITICIZING THE NEW GOVERNMENT CRITICIZING THE NEW FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE, SAYING THE NEW OF UKRAINE, SAYING THE NEW HEAD OF STATE WAS SURROUNDED BY PRESIDENT WAS SURROUNDED BY ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES. ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES. FOR UKRAINE, THAT WAS A REALLY FOR UKRAINE, THAT WAS A REALLY BIG BARGAIN. BIG DEAL. ALL RIGHT? ALL RIGHT? UKRAINE GOES TO BATTLE WITH RUSSIA, A UKRAINE IS AT WAR WITH RUSSIA, A COUNTRY VERY DEPENDING ON BOTH COUNTRY EXTREMELY DEPENDING ON BOTH OF TRUTH AND PERCEPTION OF OF TRUTH AS WELL AS PERCEPTION OF THEM HAVING STRONG ASSISTANCE FROM THEM HAVING STRONG ASSISTANCE FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. SO WHEN MR. GIULIANI, AS THE SO WHEN MR. GIULIANI, AS THE PRESIDENT’S PERSONAL ATTORNEY, PRESIDENT’S PERSONAL ATTORNEY, MADE PUBLIC CLAISMS THAT THE NEW MADE PUBLIC CLAISMS THAT THE NEW UKRAINIAN HEAD OF STATE WAS UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT WAS SURROUNDED BY ENEMIES OF THE SURROUNDED BY OPPONENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS WELL AS THAT’S WHY HE WASN’T GOING, AT THAT’S WHY HE WASN’T GOING, AT THAT POINT THE UKRAINIAN THAT FACTOR THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT SORT OF FREAKED OUT. GOVERNMENT SORT OF FREAKED OUT. THAT KIND 6 KIND OF THAT KIND 6 SORT OF ADMINISTRATION FOR THEIR NEW MANAGEMENT FOR THEIR NEW PRESIDENT IN UKRAINE, THAT’S A PRESIDENT IN UKRAINE, THAT’S A POTENTIAL FATALITY SENTENCE FOR POSSIBLE FATALITY SENTENCE FOR THEIR COUNTRY. THEIR COUNTRY. AS OCCURRED, LEV AT THE TIME THAT HAPPENED, LEV PARNAS WAS IN UKRAINE, HE WITH PARNAS WAS IN UKRAINE, HE WITH US IN KIEV AT THE TIME, AS WELL AS HE United States IN KIEV AT THE TIME, AND ALSO HE TOLD ME TODAY HE WAS TASKED BY TOLD ME TODAY HE WAS TASKED BY RUDY GIULIANI BECAUSE MOMENT TO RUDY GIULIANI IN THAT MOMENT TO CRANK UP THE STRESS OF CRANK UP THE STRESS OF UKRAINE, TO MAY BE EVEN MORE UKRAINE, TO COULD BE MORE INSISTS AREN’T, REGULARLY, EVEN URGES AREN’T, MORE OFTEN, EVEN EVEN MORE ONEROUS, THIS RISK AND MORE ONEROUS, THIS HAZARD AND DEMAND THAT UKRAINE MUST NEED THAT UKRAINE REQUIREMENT ANNOUNCE EXAMINATIONS INTO JOE ANNOUNCE EXAMINATIONS INTO JOE BIDEN OR ELSE.BIDEN OTHERWISE. DID YOU CONSULT WITH THE SERGEI DID YOU MEET THE SERGEI SHAFFER? SHAFFER? > > I DID. > > I DID. > > > HE’S >> A SENIOR AIDE TO > > > HE’S >>> A SENIOR ASSISTANT TO >>> PRESIDENT CENK UYGUR. PRESIDENT CENK UYGUR. IT’S BEEN REPORTED THAT YOU IT’S BEEN REPORTED THAT YOU COMMUNICATED TO MR. SHAFFER THE CONVEYED TO MR. SHAFFER THE EXACT QUID PRO QUO, YOU DESIRED EXACT QUID PRO QUO, YOU WANTED ZELENSKY TO ANNOUNCE ZELENSKY TO INTRODUCE INVESTIGATIONS INTO BIDEN OR INVESTIGATIONS INTO BIDEN OR SELLS ARMED FORCE HELP WOULD NOT BE MARKETS MILITARY AID WOULD NOT BE LAUNCHED. RELEASED. IS THAT ACCURATE? IS THAT ACCURATE? > > IT WAS MORE THAN THAT. > > IT WAS MORE THAN THAT.BASICALLY THE MESSAGE I OFFERED BASICALLY THE MESSAGE I GAVE SERGEI SHAFFER, I WAS TOLD TO SERGEI SHAFFER, I WAS TOLD TO PROVIDE IT TO HIM IN A ROUGH MEANS. OFFER IT TO HIM IN A HARSH WAY. > > THAT TOLD YOU THAT? > > WHO TOLD YOU THAT? > > MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI TOLD ME > > MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI TOLD ME AFTER, YOU RECOGNIZE CONSULTING WITH THE AFTER >>, YOU KNOW MEETING WITH THE HEAD OF STATE> AT THE WHITE HOUSE, HEAD OF STATE AT THE WHITE RESIDENCE, THE MESSAGE WAS IT WASN’T JUST THE MESSAGE WAS IT WASN’T SIMPLY ARMED FORCES HELP, IT WAS ALL HELP. ARMED FORCES AID, IT WAS ALL AID. BASICALLY THEIR RELATIONSHIPS BASICALLY THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WOULD BE SOUR, THAT WE WOULD WOULD BE SOUR, THAT WE WOULD STOP GRANTING THEM ANY TYPE OF STOP GRANTING THEM ANY TYPE OF HELP– AID– > > UNLESS? > > UNLESS? > >– UNLESS– THERE WERE > >– UNLESS >>– THERE >> WERE SEVERAL NEEDS AT THAT POINT.SEVERAL NEED AT THAT POINT. A,> THE A LOT OF CRUCIAL WAS THE A, THE THE MAJORITY OF IMPORTANT WAS THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE BIDEN NEWS OF THE BIDEN EXAMINATION. INVESTIGATION. > > DID YOU LIKEWISE SHARE TO HIM > > DID YOU ADDITIONALLY COMMUNICATE TO HIM THAT THE UNITED STATE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WOULD THAT THE UNITED STATE GOVERNMENT> WOULD STOP PROVING SUPPORT FOR >> MR. STOP SHOWING SUPPORT FOR MR. ZELENSKY, THAT THEY WOULDN’T ZELENSKY, THAT THEY WOULDN’T PARTICIPATE IN THE COMMENCEMENT? ATTEND THE COMMENCEMENT? > > THAT WAS THE BIGGEST POINT, > > THAT WAS THE BIGGEST POINT, ACTUALLY, THE MAIN– BECAUSE >> AT ACTUALLY, >> THE MAIN– DUE TO THE FACT THAT BACK THEN YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT TIME YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THE MEANS UKRAINE IS. THE MEANS UKRAINE IS. FOR HEAD OF STATE ZELENSKY WINNING FOR PRESIDENT ZELENSKY WINNING ON THAT PARTICULAR SYSTEM, BECOME A YOUNG ON THAT SYSTEM, END UP BEING A YOUNG HEAD OF STATE, NOT HAVING REALLY ANY PRESIDENT, NOT HAVING REALLY ANY EXPERIENCE AS WELL AS GOING TO BLEMISH EXPERIENCE AND BEING AT BLEMISH WITH RUSSIA AT THE TIME, THE WITH RUSSIA AT THE TIME, THE NUMBER ONE POINT WAS NOT EVEN LEADING POINT WAS NOT EVEN AID, AND ALSO I UNDERSTAND IT SEEMS CRAZY, AID, AND ALSO I UNDERSTAND IT APPEARS CRAZY, BUT MORE ASSISTANCE FROM THE BUT EVEN MORE ASSISTANCE FROM THE HEAD OF STATE, BY HAVING A WHITE HEAD OF STATE, BY HAVING A WHITE HOUSE GO TO, BY HAVING A BIG RESIDENCE GO TO, BY HAVING A BIG LAUNCH, BY HAVING THE INAUGURATION, BY HAVING THE DIGNITARIES THERE.DIGNITARIES THERE. THAT WAS THE TRICK. THAT WAS THE SECRET. DURING THAT TIME THEY WERE ALREADY DURING THAT TIME THEY WERE ALREADY MINDFUL SINCE OF THEIR AWARE BECAUSE OF THEIR CONVERSATIONS I HAD ASSUMPTIONS WITH CONVERSATIONS I HAD ASSUMPTIONS WITH THE EMBASSY THAT– VICE THE CONSULAR OFFICE THAT– VICE HEAD OF STATE PENCE WAS SUPPOSED TO HEAD OF STATE PENCE WAS SUPPOSED TO COME TO THE COMMENCEMENT. INVOLVE THE INAUGURATION. THEY WERE PLANNING IT OUT, THEY WERE PLANNING IT OUT, WORKING ON DAYS THAT WOULD BE DEALING WITH DAYS THAT WOULD BENEFIT HIM. GREAT FOR HIM. AT OUR MEETING, I WAS REALLY, REALLY AT OUR MEETING, I WAS REALLY, VERY STERN. STERN. IT WAS A HEATED CONVERSATION IT WAS A HEATED DISCUSSION FROM OUR COMPONENT TO HIM, BASICALLY FROM OUR PART TO HIM, BASICALLY TELLING HIM WHAT REQUIRES TO BE TELLING HIM WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, I IMPLY, BASICALLY ME.DONE, I INDICATE, BASICALLY ME. IN THE DISCUSSION, I TOLD HIM IN THE DISCUSSION, I TOLD HIM THAT IF HE DOESN’T– THE THAT IF HE DOESN’T– THE STATEMENT WAS THE KEY AT THAT STATEMENT WAS THE SECRET BACK THEN DUE TO THE MOMENT DUE TO THE FACT THAT OF THE LAUNCH, THAT PENCE WOULD INAUGURATION, THAT PENCE WOULD NOT PROGRAM UP. NOT SHOW UP. NO ONE WOULD SHOW UP TO THE NO ONE WOULD PROGRAM UP TO THE COMMENCEMENT. INAUGURATION. > > UNLESS HE ANNOUNCED AN > > UNLESS HE REVEALED AN INVESTIGATION INTO JOE BIDEN, NO EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN, NO U.S. AUTHORITIES, PARTICULARLY VICE UNITED STATE AUTHORITIES, PARTICULARLY VICE PRESIDENT PENCE WOULD NOT COME >>. HEAD OF STATE PENCE WOULD NOT COME. > > PARTICULARLY VICE HEAD OF STATE. > > PARTICULARLY VICE HEAD OF STATE. > > THE DAVID– > > THE DAVID– > > IT WAS A SUNDAY THE 12th. > > IT WAS A SUNDAY THE 12th. > > I BELIEVE IT WAS THE > > I THINK >> IT WAS THE FOLLOWING DAY THAT IN FACT VICE FOLLOWING DAY THAT AS A MATTER OF FACT VICE PRESIDENT PENCE’S GO TO TO THE PRESIDENT >> PENCE’S SEE TO THE INAUGURATION WAS CANCELED.INAUGURATION WAS CANCELED. >> > > IT WANTED MY CALL. > > IT WANTED MY PHONE CALL. THE CONVERSATION I LAID OUT WAS THE DISCUSSION I OUTLINED WAS BASICALLY WHAT I WAS TOLD TO DO BASICALLY WHAT I WAS TOLD TO ACCOMPLISH BY GIULIANI AS WELL AS THE HEAD OF STATE. >> BY GIULIANI AS WELL AS THE PRESIDENT. >> LATER ON I PASSED ON BACK THAT AFTERWARDS I PASSED ON BACK THAT HE WOULD RETURN TO ME LATER HE WOULD GET BACK TO ME LATER THAT EVENING AND WE’RE SUPPOSED TO THAT EVENING AND WE’RE SUPPOSED TO MEET. MEET. 8:00, 9:00 THAT EVENING I STATED ANY 8:00, 9:00 THAT NIGHT I STATED ANY WORD? WORD? ANY CIRCUMSTANCE? ANY SITUATION? AND ALSO YOU TIN SEE WHEN An INDIVIDUAL AS WELL AS YOU TIN SEE WHEN An INDIVIDUAL DISCONNECTS YOU.DISCONNECTS YOU. > > HE BLOCKED YOU? > > HE OBSTRUCTED YOU? > > HE OBSTRUCTED ME. > > HE OBSTRUCTED ME. I COMPREHENDED THAT WAS A NO. I RECOGNIZED THAT WAS A NO. I CALLED BACK AND STATED NO-GO, I CALLED BACK AS WELL AS STATED NO-GO, AS WELL AS I REMEMBER RUDY GOING,
OK, AS WELL AS I REMEMBER >> RUDY GOING, OKAY >>, THEY’LL SEE. THEY >>’LL SEE. >> BASICALLY THE NEXT DAY PENCE, TO BASICALLY THE NEXT DAY PENCE, TO MY RECOGNITION TRUMP CALLED AND ALSO MY RECOGNITION TRUMP CALLED AND ALSO CLAIMED ENSURE DIME DOESN’T GO SAID MAKE CERTAIN DIME DOESN’T GO THERE. THERE. > > YOU THINK MR. PENCE’S TRIP > > YOU THINK MR. PENCE’S TRIP TO THE INAUGURATION WAS CANCELED TO THE COMMENCEMENT WAS TERMINATED SINCE THEY DIDN’T AGREE– BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T AGREE– > > I UNDERSTAND. > > I RECOGNIZE. IT WAS 100%. IT WAS 100%. THE CHAIN OF OCCASIONS, THAT WAS THE CHAIN OF >> EVENTS, THAT WAS TRICK TO IN WHICH WE ARE TODAY. KEY TO IN WHICH WE ARE TODAY. AFTER THAT, TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT AFTER THAT, TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT TRANSPIRES. TRANSPIRES. >> NEXT WITHIN THE NEXT PAIR NEXT WITHIN THE NEXT PAIR DAYS, THEY REALIZE THAT CURRENTLY THEY DAYS, THEY REALIZE THAT NOW THEY OBTAIN WORD. HEAR. OBVIOUSLY WHEN PENCE CANS ALSO, OBVIOUSLY WHEN PENCE CANS ALSO, THEY HEAR. THEY OBTAIN WORD. SO NOW THEY REALIZED WHAT I WAS SO NOW THEY RECOGNIZED WHAT I WAS WAS COMING WAS TRUSS. WAS COMING WAS TRUSS. > > NOW THEY REALIZE THAT IF THEY > > NOW THEY REALIZE THAT IF THEY DIDN’T ANNOUNCE THE BIDEN DIDN’T INTRODUCE THE BIDEN INVESTIGATION THAT VICE EXAMINATION THAT VICE HEAD OF STATE PENCE WOULDN’T CONCERN HEAD OF STATE PENCE WOULDN’T COME TO THE INAUGURATION, THEY REALIZE THE INAUGURATION, THEY >> REALIZE NOW WHEN IN TRUTH PENCE CANCELED NOW WHEN ACTUALLY PENCE TERMINATED HIS LAUNCH, THEY RECOGNIZED I HIS COMMENCEMENT, THEY RECOGNIZED I WAS LEGIT.WAS LEGIT. THAT’S VITAL WHAT HE’S THAT’S IMPORTANT WHAT HE’S PHRASE. SAYING. I ENJOY HIS LINE THAT RUDY I LOVE HIS LINE THAT RUDY GIULIANI STATES, OK, THEY’LL GIULIANI SAYS, OK, THEY’LL SEE. SEE. ACTUALLY, THE VICE HEAD OF STATE IN REALITY, THE VICE PRESIDENT CENT DOES CANCEL HIS JOURNEY TO PENCE DOES CANCEL HIS TRIP TO THE INAUGURATION WITHIN 24 THE LAUNCH WITHIN 1 DAY. HRS. HOWEVER, FOR MR. PARNAS, THAT WAS A HOWEVER, FOR MR.PARNAS, THAT WAS A KEY MINUTE FOR HIM IN STIPULATIONS OF KEY MOMENT FOR HIM IN STIPULATIONS OF HAVING THE ABILITY TO PROCEED TO WORK HAVING THE ABILITY TO REMAIN TO WORK WITH THIS EFFORT IN UKRAINE WITH ON THIS INITIATIVE IN UKRAINE WITH INTEGRITY, DUE TO THE FACT THAT MIKE PENCE TRUSTWORTHINESS, BECAUSE MIKE PENCE CANCELLING HIS TRIP TO THE CANCELLING HIS TRIP TO THE LAUNCH WAS A VALIDATING INAUGURATION WAS A VALIDATING MOMENT. MOMENT. IT EXPLAINED TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IT MADE CLEAR TO THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE AT THE HIGHEST DEGREE, OF UKRAINE AT THE HIGHEST DEGREE, A SENIOR AIDE TO THE NEW An ELDERLY ASSISTANT TO THE NEW HEAD OF STATE, THIS MADE IT CLEAR PRESIDENT, THIS MADE IT CLEAR THAT LEV PARNAS WAS LEGITIMATELY THAT LEV PARNAS WAS LEGITIMATELY REPRESENTING THE HEAD OF STATE OF PORTRAYING THE HEAD OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE WHITE THE UNITED STATES AND THE WHITE RESIDENCE IN THIS SHAKEDOWN. RESIDENCE IN THIS SHAKEDOWN. > > > SO VICE HEAD OF STATE MIKE PENCE > > > SO VICE HEAD OF STATE MIKE PENCE HAS HIS PLANNED JOURNEY TO THE HAS HIS PREPARED JOURNEY TO THE INAUGURATION TERMINATED AFTER YOU INAUGURATION TERMINATED AFTER YOU WERE UNABLE TO GET THE UKRAINIAN WERE UNABLE TO OBTAIN THE UKRAINIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO ANNOUNCE GOVERNMENT TO ANNOUNCE EXAMINATIONS RIGHT INTO VICE EXAMINATIONS INTO VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN.PRESIDENT BIDEN >>>. DO YOU KNOW IF VICE PRESIDENT DO YOU RECOGNIZE IF VICE HEAD OF STATE PENCE KNEW THAT WAS THE CENT WAS CONSCIOUS THAT WAS THE QUID PRO QUO, AND IN REALITY WHY QUID PRO QUO, AND ACTUALLY WHY HIS TRIP WAS GOING TO BE PULL HIS JOURNEY WAS GOING TO BE MANAGE. OFF. > > > I’M GOING TO USAGE A QUOTE BY > > > I’M GOING TO USE A QUOTE BY SONDLAND– EVERYBODY KNEW. SONDLAND– EVERYONE KNEW.
> > EVERYONE UNDERSTOOD THAT WAS > > EVERYONE KNEW THAT WAS CONTINGENT ON THE INVESTIGATIONS SUBJECT TO THE EXAMINATIONS BEING INTRODUCED? BEING INTRODUCED? > > I KNOW HE WE AREN’T TO POLAND > > I RECOGNIZE HE WE AREN’T TO POLAND ALSO TO DISCUSS THIS ON TRUMP’S ALSO TO DISCUSS >>> THIS ON TRUMP’S BEHAVE. ACT. >>> HE COULDN’T HAVE UNCERTAIN. HE COULDN’T HAVE UNCERTAIN. > > > AFTER THE INAUGURATION, > > >> > AFTER THE LAUNCH, >> SEPTEMBER 1st, VICE HEAD OF STATE SEPTEMBER 1st, VICE HEAD OF STATE PENCE MOSTS LIKELY TO POLAND AS WELL AS TAKES A PENCE GOES TO POLAND AND TAKES A MEETING PRESIDENT ZELENSKY MEETING HEAD OF STATE >> ZELENSKY OF UKRAINE.OF UKRAINE. AMONG THE UNUSUAL DISCOVERIES AMONG THE UNUSUAL REVELATIONS WE’VE HAD SINCE THE IMPEACHMENT WE’VE HAD CONSIDERING THAT THE IMPEACHMENT EXAMINATIONS WAS A DEFENSE EXAMINATIONS WAS A DEFENSE DEPARTMENT E-MAIL >>> THAT WAS MADE DEPARTMENT EMAIL THAT WAS MADE PUBLIC WITH A LIBERTY OF PUBLIC THROUGH A FLEXIBILITY OF INFO ACT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, THAT INFO ACT ATTORNEY, THAT PROTECTION DEPARTMENT FROM THE PROTECTION DEPARTMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF STAT TO– HE INFORM CHIEF OF STAT TO–
HE TELL ANOTHER PERSON DON’T– I’M ANOTHER PERSON DON’T– I’M PARAPHRASING– THIS UKRAINE HELP PARAPHRASING– THIS UKRAINE HELP TROUBLE IS GOING TO ALL BY TROUBLE IS GOING TO ALL BY SORTED AS SOON AS VICE PRESIDENT SORTED AS QUICKLY AS VICE HEAD OF STATE PENCE MEEKS PRESIDENT ZELENSKY PENCE MEEKS PRESIDENT ZELENSKY IN POLAND. IN POLAND. > > DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY > > DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY SOMEONE IN THE SECRETARY OF SOMEONE IN THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE’S WORKPLACE MIGHT HAVE DEFENSE’S OFFICE MIGHT HAVE BELIEVED THAT? THOUGHT THAT? > > IT MAKES FEELING TO ME. > > IT MAKES FEELING TO ME. WHAT WAS TRANSPIRING IS EVERY WHAT WAS TAKING PLACE IS EACH TIME, LIKE I STATED TO YOU, SOMETIMES, LIKE I STATED TO YOU, AT EVERY CONFERENCE EITHER GIULIANI OR EVERY MEETING EITHER GIULIANI OR I WOULD HAVE, OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WOUL I WOULD HAVE, OR GOVERNMENT WOUL HAVE WITH THE UKRAINIANS, THEY HAVE WITH THE UKRAINIANS, THEY WOULD ALSO AGREE THAT THEY WERE WOULD ALSO AGREE THAT THEY WERE GOING TO MAKE SOME KIND OF– GOING TO MAKE SOME KIND OF– THAT THEY GOT ON BOARD, THEY’LL THAT THEY WERE ON BOARD, THEY’LL MAKE AN STATEMENT>, AND AFTERWARDS MAKE AN NEWS, AND AFTER THAT THEY WOULD STROLL IT BACK. THEY WOULD WALK IT BACK. AFTER CERTAIN INSTANCES AFTER SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS SUPPOSED TO PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS SUPPOSED TO MEET ZELENSKY IN POLAND HIMSELF.MEET ZELENSKY IN POLAND HIMSELF. BUT THEY HE USED THE EXECUTION BUT THEY HE UTILIZED THE EXECUTION OF THE TYPHOON. OF THE TYPHOON. IT WASN’T AS A RESULT OF THE IT WASN’T DUE TO THE STORM. TYPHOON. IT WAS BECAUSE HE WAS ANGRY THAT IT WAS BECAUSE HE WAS ANGRY THAT ZELENSKY STILL DIDN’T MAKE ANY ZELENSKY STILL DIDN’T MAKE ANY TEEM OR INITIATIVE TO MAKE ANY TEEM OR EFFORT TO MAKE ANY STATEMENT. ANNOUNCEMENT. > > HOW DO YOU RECOGNIZE THAT WASN’T > > HOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT WASN’T AN EXCUSE. AN EXCUSE. > > I TALKED WITH RUDY. > > I TALKED TO RUDY. WE SPOKE ABOUT THIS EVERY DAY. WE SPOKE ABOUT THIS ON A DAILY BASIS. EVERYTHING THAT WAS HAPPENING WAS WHATEVER THAT WAS HAPPENING WAS BETWEEN ME, VICTORIA, RUDY, THE BETWEEN ME, VICTORIA, RUDY, THE TEAM. GROUP. > > SO HEAD OF STATE TRUMP IS > > SO PRESIDENT TRUMP IS SUPPOSED TO GO, HE DETERMINES NOT MEANT TO GO, HE CHOOSES NOT TO GO.TO GO. > > HE SENDS OUT VICE PRESIDENT > > HE SENDS VICE PRESIDENT INSTEAD. RATHER. HE’S TO GO THERE AND GET IT HE’S TO GO THERE AS WELL AS GET IT STRAIGHTENED THAT ZELENSKY STRAIGHTENED THAT ZELENSKY WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE ANOTHER PERSON WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE ANOTHER PERSON >> STATEMENT. ANNOUNCEMENT. THAT DIDN’T TAKE PLACE. THAT DIDN’T TAKE PLACE. THAT’S WHEN >> BOLTON, SECRETARY >> THAT’S WHEN BOLTON, SECRETARY BOLTON, REVIEWED THERE. BOLTON, WENT OVER THERE. I THINK HE HAS A GREAT DEAL TO SAY. I THINK HE HAS A WHOLE LOT TO SAY. I THINK HE’S A KEY WITNESS TO I ASSUME HE’S A KEY WITNESS TO HIS CONVERSATION WITH ZELENSKY >>, HIS DISCUSSION WITH ZELENSKY, AS WELL AS WHEN HE RETURNED AND WHY HE AND WHEN HE CAME BACK AS WELL AS
WHY HE LEFT, GOT FIRED, HOWEVER YOU> LEFT, GOT TERMINATED, NEVERTHELESS YOU INTEND TO LOOK AT THAT.WANT TO CHECK OUT THAT. > > WHEN VICE HEAD OF STATE PEN WENT > > WHEN VICE PRESIDENT PEN LOOKED AT THERE SEPTEMBER 1st, IN THERE SEPTEMBER 1st, IN HEAD OF STATE TRUMP’S STEAD, YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP’S STEAD, YOU HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE THAT VICE HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE THAT VICE PRESIDENT PENCE WAS TASKED AT HEAD OF STATE PENCE WAS TASKED AT THAT MEETING GETTING THAT MEETING GETTING HEAD OF STATE ZELENSKY TO REVEAL PRESIDENT ZELENSKY TO REVEAL EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN SPECIFICALLY AND LET THEM KNOW THEY ESPECIALLY AND ALSO LET THEM KNOW THEY WOULDN’T OBTAIN THE AID– WOULDN’T GET THE AID– > > I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY, BUT > > I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY, BUT LIKE I STATED, THE HELP ITSELF WAS LIKE I STATED, THE HELP ITSELF WAS SOMETHING THAT I >> THINK THE SOMETHING THAT I THINK THE PRESIDENT DECIDED TO DO– PRESIDENT MADE A DECISION TO ACCOMPLISH– WHAT’S IT CALLED? WHAT’S IT CALLED? I BELIEVE IT WAS A REACTION THAT I THINK IT WAS A REACTION THAT THERE WAS NO STATEMENT BEING THERE WAS NO STATEMENT BEING MADE AFTER MANY ATTEMPTS AND ALSO MADE AFTER A LOT OF ATTEMPTS AS WELL AS SO LOTS PERFORMS.SO LOTS OF PERFORMS. > > HOLDING THE AID WAS THE > > HOLDING THE AID WAS THE PRESIDENT’S KIND OF TECHNOLOGY PRESIDENT’S TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY TO INCLUDE IN THE LEVERAGE– TO INCLUDE IN THE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF– > > I BELIEVE SO. > > I THINK SO. > > > CONTRIBUTE TO THE STRESS THAT > > > INCLUDE IN THE STRESS THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOU >>, THE VICE PEOPLE LIKE YOU, THE >> VICE HEAD OF STATE, MR. GIULIANI, HEAD OF STATE, MR. GIULIANI, EVERYBODY ELSE INCLUDED WAS EVERYONE ELSE ENTAILED WAS PUTTING ON UKRAINE.PUTTING ON UKRAINE. > > WHEN YOU STATE MR. BOLTON MAY > > WHEN YOU STATE MR. BOLTON MAY HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, DID MR. HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, DID MR. BOLTON KNOW THAT VICE PRESIDENT BOLTON KNOW THAT VICE HEAD OF STATE PENCE WAS SUPPOSED TO PROTECT PENCE WAS SUPPOSED TO SECURE THAT AGREEMENT? THAT CONTRACT? > > I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY, BUT I > > I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY, BUT I UNDERSTAND
MR. BOLTON WAS DEFINITELY> KNOW MR.BOLTON WAS DEFINITELY INVOLVED IN THE LOOPHOLE AS A RESULT OF INVOLVED IN THE LOOP DUE TO THES SHOOTING OF MARIA THES SHOOTING OF MARIA YOVANOVITCH. YOVANOVITCH. AS WELL AS HE WAS NOT– THEY BEGAN AS WELL AS> HE WAS NOT– THEY BEGAN BUTTING HEADS, AND FROM BOLTON >>> BUTTING HEADS, AND FROM BOLTON DID NOT AGREE WITH GIULIANI ON DID NOT AGREE WITH GIULIANI ON THE METHOD OF TAKING CARE OF IT, SO THE METHOD OF HANDLING IT, SO THERE WAS TENSION THERE. THERE WAS STRESS THERE.
THERE WAS DEFINITELY STRESS THERE WAS DEFINITELY TENSION THERE >>. THERE. > > BUT YOU THINK HE RECOGNIZES WHAT > > BUT YOU BELIEVE HE KNOWS WHAT THE MANAGEMENT WAS THE ADMINISTRATION WAS PRESSURING UKRAINE TO PERFORM? PRESSING UKRAINE TO PERFORM? > > BOLTON? > > BOLTON? 100 %. 100%. HE KNOWS WHAT OCCURRED THERE. HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT HAPPENED THERE. > > > LEV PARNAS IN AN SPECIAL > > > LEV PARNAS IN AN EXCLUSIVE MEETING WITH ME TODAY IN NEW INTERVIEW WITH ME
TODAY IN NEW YORK CITY.YORK CITY. WE HAVE CONTACTED VICE PRESIDENT WE HAVE GOT IN TOUCH WITH VICE PRESIDENT PENCE’S WORKPLACE TONIGHT ON THIS PENCE’S WORKPLACE TONIGHT ON THIS ACCUSATION THAT THE SEE TO THE ACCUSATION THAT THE SEE TO THE ZELENSKY COMMENCEMENT WALLS ZELENSKY COMMENCEMENT WALLS TERMINATED SINCE UKRAINIAN TERMINATED SINCE UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL WOULDN’T ANNOUNCE OFFICIAL WOULDN’T REVEAL EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN. EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN. ALSO THE ACCUSATIONS THAT VICE ADDITIONALLY THE ALLEGATIONS THAT VICE PRESIDENT CENT WAS TASKED BY> PRESIDENT PENCE WAS TASKED BY GETTING THAT COMMITMENT IN HELLO ACQUIRING THAT COMMITMENT IN HELLO FOLLOW-UP GO TO WHEN HE MET WITH FOLLOW-UP SEE WHEN HE MET WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY IN POLAND. PRESIDENT ZELENSKY IN >> POLAND. WE HAVE ASKED FOR COMMENT FROM WE HAVE REQUESTED COMMENT FROM MIKE PENCE’S >>> WORKPLACE ON THOSE MIKE PENCE’S OFFICE>> ON THOSE MATTERS.MATTERS. WE HAVE NOT LISTENED TO BACK. WE HAVE NOT LISTENED TO BACK. WE’LL LET YOU UNDERSTAND BECAUSE WE’LL LET YOU KNOW BECAUSE ADJUSTMENTS.
MODIFICATIONS. FOR HELLO THERE COMPONENT, JOHN BOLTON SAID HE FOR HI COMPONENT, JOHN BOLTON CLAIMED HE WOULD DEMONSTRATE THE SENATE WOULD BEAR WITNESS THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IF SUMMONED IMPEACHMENT TEST IF SUMMONED TO DO SO. TO PERFORM SO. HE HAS MADE PUBLIC REMARKS THAT HE HAS MADE PUBLIC REMARKS THAT HE HAS RELEVANT INFO HE HAS PERTINENT INFORMATION ABOUT THE IMPEACHMENT ABOUT THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, HE UNDERSTANDS POINTS EXAMINATION, HE UNDERSTANDS POINTS OTHER INDIVIDUAL DON’T KNOW.OTHER PEOPLE DON’T KNOW. IN REGARDS TO THE PRESIDENT AS WELL AS IN REGARDS TO THE HEAD OF STATE AND ALSO THIS ALLEGATIONS PROR– FROM THIS ALLEGATIONS PROR– FROM MR. PARNAS THAT HE GAVE MR. PARNAS THAT HE PROVIDED EXCLUSIVE– THAT MR. GIULIANI EXCLUSIVE– THAT MR. GIULIANI CLEARLY TOLD UKRAINIAN CLEARLY TOLD UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES, ON THE AUTHORITY OF OFFICIALS, ON THE AUTHORITY OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, THEY MUST PAY ATTENTION TO STATES, THEY MUST LISTEN TO MR. PARNAS, HE WAS QUITING THE MR. PARNAS, HE WAS QUITING THE COMPLETE CONCEPT OF LEGAL FULL CONCEPT OF LEGAL DEPICTION, THAT HE WAS DEPICTION, THAT HE WAS TOTALLY MINDFUL OF AND INCLUDED IN TOTALLY CONSCIOUS OF AS WELL AS INVOLVED IN ALL HIS EFFORTS, WE HAVE ASKED ALL HIS INITIATIVES, WE HAVE ASKED THE WHITE HOUSE FOR TALK ABOUT THE WHITE HOUSE FOR TALK ABOUT MR. PARNAS’S STATEMENTS, WE HAVE MR. PARNAS’S REMARKS, WE HAVE NOT HEARD BACK.NOT HEARD BACK. >>> > > > BUT NEXT BELOW COMES THE COMPONENT >>> > > > THERE WERE NOTES RELEASED TO >>> > > > THERE WERE NOTES RELEASED TO THE KNOWLEDGE BOARD THAT THE KNOWLEDGE COMMITTEE THAT WERE NOT LAUNCHED PUBLICLY, AND WERE NOT RELEASED OPENLY, AS WELL AS IF YOU DON’T MIND, I WISHED TO ASK IF YOU DON’T MIND, I DESIRED TO ASK YOU ABOUT SEVERAL OF THESE.YOU ABOUT SOME OF THESE. > > SURE. >> > > SURE. >> > > WERE THESE NOTES THAT YOU >> > > WERE THESE NOTES THAT YOU TOOK– I’LL PROGRAM THEM TO YOU TOOK– I’LL SHOW THEM TO YOU HERE, OBVIOUSLY ON RITZ KARL TON BELOW, OBVIOUSLY ON RITZ KARL BUNCH VIENNA VIENNA– CARLTON, WERE THIS IS NOTES– CARLTON, WERE THIS IS NOTES FROM A PHONE CONVERSATION? FROM A TELEPHONE CALL? >> > > THIS WAS A TELEPHONE CALL >> > > THIS WAS A PHONE CONVERSATION I WAS HAVING WITH MR. GIULIANI, I WAS HAVING WITH MR. GIULIANI, BASICALLY DISCUSSING CERTAIN BASICALLY REVIEWING PARTICULAR POINTS. POINTS. AFTERWARDS I WOULD HAVE HAD AFTER THAT I WOULD HAVE HAD SOMEONE FROM THE ZELENSKY TEAM.SOMEBODY FROM THE ZELENSKY GROUP. > > YOU WERE FROM VIENNA AT THE >> > > YOU WERE FROM VIENNA AT THE >> TIME? TIME? > > CORRECT. > > CORRECT. > > FIRST >> NOTE– OBTAIN >> ZELENSKY >> TO > > FIRST KEEP IN MIND– OBTAIN ZELENSKY TO >> ANNOUNCE THE BIDEN CASE WILL CERTAINLY BE REVEAL THE BIDEN CASE WILL BE INVESTIGATING. INVESTIGATING. THAT’S MR. GIULIANI TASKING YOU? THAT’S MR. GIULIANI TASKING YOU? > > THAT WAS ALWAYS THE PRIMARY > > THAT WAS >> ALWAYS THE PRIMARY >> OBJECTIVE.OBJECTIVE. > > > MAIN GOAL,
OBTAIN THEM TO > >>> > > MAIN GOAL, OBTAIN THEM TO >>> REVEAL THEY WERE INVESTIGATING ANNOUNCE THEY WERE INVESTIGATING JOE BIDEN. JOE BIDEN. THAT’S MR. PARNAS TALK WITH ME THAT’S MR. PARNAS TALK TO ME TODAY IN NEW YORK CITY CITY. TODAY IN NEW YORK CITY. ONE OF THE DARK HEARTS OF THIS AMONG THE DARK HEARTS OF THIS IS THE VIRULENT, SKULL LUTZ Z IS THE TOXIC, HEAD LUTZ Z SCURRILOUS INITIATIVE TO FIRE MARIA SCURRILOUS INITIATIVE TO FIRE MARIA YOVANOVITCH. YOVANOVITCH. HE LIKEWISE MADE CRYSTAL CLEAR WHY HE ALSO MADE CRYSTAL CLEAR WHY SHE WAS TARGETED. SHE WAS TARGETED. >> > > DO YOU BELIEVE THAT COMPONENT OF >> > > DO YOU BELIEVE THAT COMPONENT OF THE INSPIRATION TO GET HER OUT OF THE INSPIRATION TO OBTAIN HER OUT OF ARTICLE IS SHE WAS IN THE WAY OF MESSAGE IS SHE WAS IN THE MEANS OF THIS EFFORT TO GET THE THIS EFFORT TO GET THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE TO GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE TO INTRODUCE EXAMINATION OF JOE ANNOUNCE INVESTIGATION OF JOE BIDEN? BIDEN? >> > > THAT WAS THE ONLY MOTIVATION.
>> > > THAT WAS THE ONLY INSPIRATION. THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE INSPIRATION. THERE WAS NO OTHER INSPIRATION. >>> > > > IF AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH > > >>> IF AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH WAS TARGETED BY LEV PARNAS, RUDY WAS TARGETED BY LEV PARNAS, RUDY GIULIANI, HEAD OF STATE TRUMP, GIULIANI, HEAD OF STATE TRUMP, OTHERS INVOLVED IN THIS INITIATIVE OTHERS INVOLVED IN THIS INITIATIVE TO GET HER OUT OF BLOG POST, TO REACH GET HER OUT OF BLOG POST, TO GET HER OUT OF METHOD OF THE BOG GUS HER OUT OF WAY OF THE BOG GUS JOE BIDEN EXAMINATION– OUR JOE BIDEN INVESTIGATION– OUR PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF THAT PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF THAT WAR HER TOOK A REALLY PROJECT AGAINST HER TOOK A REALLY DARK TURN LAST NIGHT, WHEN DARK TURN LAST NIGHT, WHEN INFO THAT LEV PARNAS DETAILS THAT LEV PARNAS TURNED OVER TO IMPEACHMENT TURNED OVER TO IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATORS EXPOSED MENACING INVESTIGATORS EXPOSED MENACING TEXT FROM A REPUBLICAN MESSAGE MESSAGES FROM A REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN CONGRESSIONAL PROSPECT NAMED LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATE NAMED ROBERT HYDE, THAT OCCURS IN ROBERT HYDE, THAT OCCURS IN THESE TEXTS TO BE REPORTING IN THESE TEXTS TO BE REPORTING IN TO LEV PARNAS ABOUT SURVEILLANCE TO LEV PARNAS ABOUT SECURITY OF AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, OF AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, ASKING LEV IF HE WANTED HER OUT ASKING LEV IF HE DESIRED HER OUT AND IF THERE WAS A CALL IN AND IF THERE WAS A CALL IN HER SECURITY TEAM.HER SECURITY TEAM. I ASKED PARNAS ABOUT THAT. I ASKED PARNAS ABOUT THAT. HE TOLD ME HE DID NOT TAKE HE INFORMED ME HE DID NOT TAKE ROBERT HYDE SERIOUSLY, EITHER IN ROBERT HYDE SERIOUSLY, EITHER GENERALLY OR THE MESSAGES. GENERAL OR THE MESSAGES. HE CONCURRED THE MESSAGES WERE HE CONCURRED THE MESSAGES WERE DISTURBING, BUT HE NEVER DISTURBING, BUT HE NEVER THOUGHT MR. HYDE’S ASSERTIONS BELIEVED MR. HYDE’S ASSERTIONS REGARDING THE PURPORTED SURVEILLANCE REGARDING THE SUPPOSED SECURITY NOR DID HE THINK THAT NOR DID HE BELIEVE THAT AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH WAS AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH WAS ACTUALLY AT RISK. ACTUALLY IN RISK. >> > > WHO IS ROBERT HYDE? >> > > WHO IS ROBERT HYDE? >> > > HE’S A– HE’S SIMPLY– I > > HE’S A– HE’S JUST– I DON’T KNOW HOW TO EXPLAIN HIM.DON ‘T KNOW HOW> TO EXPLAIN HIM. > > I CAN BLEEP YOU >> IF THE DEMAND > > I TIN BLEEP YOU IF THE DEMAND TO SWEAR. TO SWEAR. >> > > HE’S An ODD CHARACTER. > > HE’S An UNUSUAL PERSONALITY. HE’S An UNUSUAL PERSON. HE’S A STRANGE INDIVIDUAL. >> > > YOU MET HIM WHERE? >> > > YOU MET HIM IN WHICH? >> > > I THINK AT THE TRUMP RESORT. >> > > I ASSUME AT THE TRUMP HOTEL. HE WAS A REGULAR AT THE BAR. HE WAS A REGULAR AT BENCH. >> > > SO WE NOW HAVE YOUR TEXT >> > > SO WE NOW HAVE YOUR TEXT WITH MR. HYDE THAT OBTAIN MESSAGES WITH MR. HYDE THAT GET INTO SOME DARK REGION WHEN IT RIGHT INTO SOME DARK TERRITORY WHEN IT CONCERNS AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH. COMES TO AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH. >> > > YES. >> > > YES. > > IT SEEMS THAT IS >> TYPE OF > > IT SEEMS THAT IS KIND OF STARTS, A MINIMUM OF WHAT WE’VE GOT STARTS, AT THE VERY LEAST WHAT WE’VE GOT YOU TEXTING HIM THAT SHOWS UP TO YOU TEXTING HIM THAT SEEMS ANTI-YOVANOVITCH– BE ANTI-YOVANOVITCH– >> > > ROBERT HYDE IS SOMEBODY WHO >> > > ROBERT HYDE IS SOMEBODY THAT WOULD HANG AROUND, DUE TO THE FACT THAT HE WOULD SPEND TIME, BECAUSE HE DID KNOW– HE DIDN’T KNOW THE DID KNOW– HE DIDN’T KNOW THE PRESIDENT, AND HE DIDN’T KNOW PRESIDENT, AND HE DIDN’T KNOW RUDY GIULIANI, BUT THEY DID KNOW RUDY GIULIANI, BUT THEY DID KNOW McCARTHY, HE KNEW ROGER ROCK, McCARTHY, HE UNDERSTOOD ROGER ROCK, ALL THEY WILL CERTAINLY– BECAUSE IT WAS ALL THEY WILL– SINCE IT RESEMBLED A REPRODUCTION GROUND AT THE LIKE A BREEDING GROUND AT THE TRUMP HOTEL.TRUMP RESORT.
EVERY OCCASION WAS THERE, AND EVERY EVENT WAS THERE, AND ALSO EVERYONE WOULD HANG OUT EVERYBODY WOULD SOCIALIZE AFTERWARDS. LATER ON. SO YOU WOULD SEE THE VERY SAME PEOPLE SO YOU WOULD SEE THE VERY SAME PEOPLE THE SAME DAY. THE SAME DAY. SO HE WAS A FIXTURE ON VIEW. SO HE WAS A FIXTURE ON SIGHT. HE WAS ALWAYS THERE, BUT HE WAS HE WAS ALWAYS THERE, BUT HE WAS CONSTANTLY DRUNK. ALWAYS DRUNK.
>> > > YOU STRUCK UP A CONNECTION >> > > YOU STRUCK UP A RELATIONSHIP ENOUGH TO BE TEXTING HIM. SUFFICIENT TO BE TEXTING HIM. >> > > IT WAS EVEN MORE OF IGOR HAD EVEN MORE >> > > IT WAS MORE OF IGOR HAD MORE CONNECTION. CONNECTION. HE SIMPLY COULDN’T CONSULT WITH HE JUST COULDN’T TALK WITH IGOR, BECAUSE THEY WERE– THEY IGOR, BECAUSE THEY WERE– THEY WERE USUALLY AFTER WE WERE DONE WERE USUALLY AFTER WE WERE DONE FOR THE NIGHT, THE BAR SCENE WAS FOR THE NIGHT, THE BAR SCENE WAS HAPPENING, AND I DON’T BEVERAGE, SO HAPPENING, AS WELL AS I DON’T DRINK, SO THEY WOULD SOCIALIZE, HAVE A THEY WOULD HANG AROUND, HAVE A DRINK AT BENCH. DRINK AT BENCH. >> > > THE TEXT MESSAGES HE SENDS >> > > THE TEXT HE SENDS ARE DISTURBING. ARE DISTURBING. >> > > REALLY. >> > > REALLY. > > WHAT IS THE CONTEXT> OF THESE > > WHAT IS THE CONTEXT OF THESE TEXT EXCHANGES? TEXT EXCHANGES? HE SEEMS GRANTING YOU HE SHOWS UP TO BE PROVIDING YOU CERTAIN INFO ABOUT THE CERTAIN DETAILS REGARDING THE AMBASSADOR’S ACTIVITY, ABOUT HER AMBASSADOR’S MOVEMENT, ABOUT HER PLACE, THE PROTECTION LOCATION, THE SECURITY SITUATION, CALLS HER THE B-WORD SITUATION, CALLS HER THE B-WORD OVER AS WELL AS OVER ONCE AGAIN, SEEMS OVER AND ALSO OVER ONCE MORE, APPEARS AGGRESSIVE AS WELL AS SURVEILLANCE HER HOSTILE AND CHECKING HER WHEREABOUTS.WHEREABOUTS.
> > CORRECT. >> > > CORRECT >>. >> > > WHY DID THOSE EXCHANGES >> > > WHY DID THOSE EXCHANGES HAPPEN? OCCUR? >> > > I DON’T BELIEVE IT >>’S TRUE. > > I DON’T THINK IT’S TRUE. HE WAS EITHER DRUNK OR TRYING TO HE WAS EITHER DRUNK OR TRYING TO MAKE HIMSELF BIGGER THAN HE WAS, MAKE HIMSELF BIGGER THAN HE WAS, SO I DIDN’T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, SO I DIDN’T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, AND ALSO IF YOU SEE, I DIDN’T RESPOND AS WELL AS IF YOU SEE, I DIDN’T RESPOND A LOT OF THE TIME. THE MAJORITY OF THE MOMENT. IF I DID IT WAS SOMETHING LOOK IF I DID IT WAS SOMETHING LOOK LOL, O.K. OR FANTASTIC. LOL, O.K. OR GREAT. I DIDN’T WANT HIM TO GET BRAWLER I DIDN’T WANT HIM TO OBTAIN ROWDY IF I SAW HIM THE NEXT TIME, WHY IF I SAW HIM THE NEXT TIME, WHY DIDN’T YOU TEXT? DIDN’T YOU TEXT? ULTIMATELY I REDUCE HIM OFF.EVENTUALLY I REDUCE
HIM OFF. I GOT DISTURBED, LIKE, THIS IS I GOT DISTURBED, LIKE, THIS IS CRAZY. CRAZY. SO I CONTACTED JOE AHERN, MY SO I CALLED UP JOE AHERN, MY CALL AT THE SUPER-PAC AMERICA CONTACT AT THE SUPER-PAC AMERICA FIRST, THAT KNEW OF HIM ALSO, FIRST, THAT KNEW OF HIM ALSO, BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD ALL THE CONTRIBUTORS. SINCE HE UNDERSTOOD ALL THE DONORS. I ASKED HIM, I STATED, WELL, IS I ASKED HIM, I CLAIMED, WELL, IS THIS INDIVIDUAL OFF THE LOONIES? THIS GUY OFF THE LOONIES? HE TOLD ME, KEEP AWAY FROM HIM, HE TOLD ME, KEEP AWAY FROM HIM, SINCE HE’S GOT INTO SOMETHING BECAUSE HE’S GOT INTO SOMETHING WITH GREG PENCE, MIKE PENCE’S WITH GREG PENCE, MIKE PENCE’S SIBLING, ASSUMING THE SECRET BROTHER, BELIEVING THE TRICK SERVICE A AFTER HIM, SOMEBODY SOLUTION A AFTER HIM, SOMEONE WANTS TO KILL HIM. WANTS TO KILL HIM. I DON’T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, BUT I DON’T KNOW WHAT TOOK PLACE, ONCE HE BEGAN TEXTING ME THAT, WHEN HE STARTED TEXTING ME THAT, THAT WAS THE END OF THE THAT WAS COMPLETION OF THE RELATIONSHIP.RELATIONSHIP.
THE TEXTS WHERE HE WAS THE MESSAGES WHERE HE WAS APPARENTLY REPORTING ON THE APPARENTLY REPORTING ON THE LOCATIONS OF THE AMBASSADOR, WHEREABOUTS OF THE AMBASSADOR, WAS FOR A WEEK. WAS FOR A WEEK. HE COULDN’T HAVE BEEN DRUNK THE HE COULDN’T HAVE BEEN DRUNK THE WHOLE TIME. WHOLE TIME. >> > > HE WAS INTOXICATED THE >> ENTIRE TIME. > > HE WAS INTOXICATED THE
WHOLE TIME.HE GETS UP– HE BEGINS AT HE AWAKENED– HE BEGINS AT 6:00– I have actually NEVER SEEN HIM NOT 6:00– I have actually NEVER SEEN HIM NOT DRUNK. DRUNK. >> > > SO YOU THOUGHT THIS WAS HIM >> > > SO YOU BELIEVED THIS WAS HIM PRODUCTION IT UP. MAKING IT UP. YOU DIDN’T BELIEVE HE HAD THE YOU DIDN’T BELIEVE HE HAD THE AMBASSADOR UNDER SECURITY? AMBASSADOR UNDER SURVEILLANCE? >> > > NOT >>. >> > > DEFINITELY NOT. > > I ASKED HIM SEVERAL TIMES IF > > I ASKED HIM SEVERAL TIMES IF THOSE TEXT FROM ROBERT THOSE SMS MESSAGE FROM ROBERT HYDE INDICATED A REAL HAZARD TO HYDE SHOWED A GENUINE THREAT TO AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH. AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH. I ASKED HIM ABOUT IT WITH AS I ASKED HIM ABOUT IT WITH AS LOTS ANGLES I CAN’T THINK OF, LOTS ANGLES I CAN’T THINK OF, AS WELL AS HE WAS ADAMANT IN HIS AS WELL AS HE WAS DETERMINED IN HIS THOUGHTS.THOUGHTS.
> > > ARE YOU >>> CLEAR ON WHETHER OR >>> > > > ARE YOU CLEAR ON WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS EVER AS ACTUAL NOT THERE WAS EVER AS ACTUAL PHYSICAL RISK OR A RISK OF PHYSICAL DANGER OR A DANGER OF PERSONAL INTIMIDATION AGAINST PERSONAL SCARE TACTICS AGAINST AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH? AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH? >> > > NEVER FROM MY SIDE OR ANYBODY >> > > NEVER FROM MY SIDE OR ANYONE I RECOGNIZE. I RECOGNIZE. >> > > YOU DIDN’T FEAR SHE WAS >> > > YOU DIDN’T FEAR SHE WAS ACTUALLY IN PHYSICAL THREAT. ACTUALLY IN PHYSICAL THREAT.
>> > > NO, NEVER >>. >> > > NO, NEVER. > > DUE TO THE FACT THAT YOU DIDN’T BELIEVE > > SINCE YOU DIDN’T THINK MR. HYDE. MR. HYDE. >> > > NO, I DIDN’T BELIEVE MR. >> > > NO, I DIDN’T BELIEVE MR. HYDE, NO. HYDE, NO. >>> > > > WE CONTACTED LAWYERS FRO >>> > > > WE CONTACTED ATTORNEYS FRO AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH TO LET AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH TO ALLOW THEM LEARN ABOUT THESE STATEMENTS THEM LEARN ABOUT THESE STATEMENTS ABOUT THIS POSSIBLE THREAT TO ABOUT THIS FEASIBLE THREAT TO THEIR CLIENT. THEIR CUSTOMER. THEY ARE NOT COMMENTING TONIGHT, THEY ARE NOT COMMENTING THIS EVENING, BUT WE’VE GOT EVEN MORE AHEAD, BUT WE’VE OBTAINED MORE AHEAD, INCLUDING WHAT ENDS UP BEING A INCLUDING WHAT WINDS UP BEING An EXTREMELY DIFFICULT CONVERSATION VERY HARD DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER OF ABOUT THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM BARR.THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM BARR. > > > DID RUDY GIULIANI TELL YOU > > >> DID RUDY GIULIANI TELL YOU >>> HE HAD SUPPOSE TO THE LAWYER HE HAD SUPPOSE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE United States ESPECIALLY REGARDING GENERAL SPECIFICALLY CONCERNING UKRAINE? UKRAINE? > > NOCHBL RUDY GIULIANI. > > NOCHBL RUDY GIULIANI. >> VICTORIA AND JOE, THEY WERE ALL VICTORIA AS WELL AS JOE, THEY WERE ALL BUDDIES T CHIEF LAW OFFICER > > > PAUL FACTOR OF PERSONAL > > > PAUL POINT OF> PERSONAL >>> ADVANTAGE. BENEFIT. AMONG STRANGE THINGS FOR ME OVER ONE OF UNUSUAL THINGS FOR ME OVER THE PAST FEW MOMENTS IS RIGHT AT THE PAST FEW MINUTES IS RIGHT AS HOME ANNOUNCED THE TIME THAT RESIDENCE INTRODUCED IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS, I RIGHT IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURES, I RIGHT AFTER THAT, THAT WEEK, WAS POSTING AFTER THAT, THAT WEEK, WAS PUBLISHING A PUBLICATION CALLED “” BLOWOUT”” ABOUT A PUBLICATION CALLED “” BLOWOUT”” ABOUT THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR. THE OIL AND ALSO GAS INDUSTRY.IN THE BOOK I UTILIZED THE TALE IN GUIDE I USED THE TALE THAT I ASSUMED WAS AN THAT I ASSUMED WAS AN INTERESTING SIDEBAR UP STORY INTERESTING SIDEBAR UP TALE ABOUT DIMITRI VERTASH, TO TELL A ABOUT DIMITRI VERTASH, TO TELL A TALE ABOUT RUSSIA WAS STORY ABOUT RUSSIA WAS PURPOSELY– AND AFTER THAT AS THE PURPOSELY– AND AFTER THAT AS THE BOOK WAS APPEARING, APART FROM PUBLICATION WAS UPCOMING OUT, APART FROM DIMITT RICK WAS REVEALED TO BE DIMITT RICK WAS REVEALED TO BE AMONG THE FORCES AT FUNCTION TO TRY ONE OF THE PRESSURES AT THE WORKPLACE TO TRY TO SMEAR THIS CAMPAIGN TO SMEAR TO SMEAR THIS PROJECT TO SMEAR JOE BIDEN, FIRE THE AMBASSADOR.JOE BIDEN, FIRE THE AMBASSADOR. IT WAS ENTIRELY UNINTENDED ON IT WAS ENTIRELY UNINTENTIONAL ON MY PART. MY PART. IT WAS A LITTLE AN ACADEMIC NEWS IT WAS A BIT OF AN ACADEMIC NEWS WORLD CAR CRASH. GLOBE AUTO ACCIDENT. NOW TODAY DIMITT RICK FURTASH NOW TODAY DIMITT RICK FURTASH FACTOR HAS BEEN MORE MYSTERIOUS. ASPECT HAS BEEN EVEN MORE MYSTERIOUS.HE IS UNDER FEDERAL INDICTMENT. HE IS UNDER FEDERAL CHARGE. HE’S UNDER CHARGE ON HE’S UNDER CHARGE ON MULTIPLE SERIOUS FELONY MULTIPLE SERIOUS FELONY CORRUPTION CHARGES, COMBATING CORRUPTION CHARGES, COMBATING EXTRADITION TO THE UNITED EXTRADITION TO THE UNITED STATES, CURRENTLY UNDER HOUSE STATES, CURRENTLY UNDER HOUSE ARREST IN VIENNA. APPREHENSION IN VIENNA. THE FACTOR WHY THIS OBTAINED LESS THE REASON THIS OBTAINED LESS MYSTERIOUS MYSTERIOUS STRANGE, IN MY MEETING, LEV MYSTERIOUS, IN MY INTERVIEW, LEV PARNAS LED TO OUT BASICALLY PARNAS LED TO OUT BASICALLY WHAT THIS OLIGARCH, DIMITRI WHAT THIS OLIGARCH, DIMITRI FIRTASH WAS DOING, AND HOW IT FIRTASH WAS DOING, AND HOW IT ALL INEVITABLY BRINGS United States TO THE ALL ULTIMATELY BRINGS US TO THE WORKDESK OF THE LAWYER GENERAL OF WORKDESK OF THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM BARR. THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM BARR. > > > SO AT SOME FACTOR WE HAD A > > > SO AT SOME FACTOR WE HAD A MEETING AT OUR– IN OUR OFFICE CONFERENCE AT OUR– IN OUR OFFICE >>> ON THE SECOND FLOOR.ON THE SECONDLY FLOORING >>>. > > AT THE TRUMP HOTEL? > > AT THE TRUMP RESORT? > > AT THE TRUMP HOTEL. > > AT THE TRUMP RESORT.
AT THAT CONSULTING WITH RUDY AND ALSO> AT THAT CONSULTING WITH RUDY AS WELL AS VICTORIA AND JOE, JOHN BROUGHT VICTORIA AS WELL AS JOE, JOHN BROUGHT >> UP SAYING HE HAD SOME INCREDIBLE UP SAYING HE HAD SOME INCREDIBLE INFO FROM FIRTASH CAMP, DETAILS FROM FIRTASH CAMP, WHICH LATER ON WAS FOUND OUT THAT WHICH LATER WAS FOUND OUT THAT LENNY DAVIS OFFERED IT TO HIM, BUT LENNY DAVIS GAVE IT TO HIM, BUT BASICALLY SHOWED THAT ANDREW BASICALLY REVEALED THAT ANDREW WEISMAN WAS DOING SOME LEGAL WEISMAN WAS DOING SOME LEGAL STUFF, OFFERING An OFFER AS WELL AS IT STUFF, OFFERING A BARGAIN AND ALSO IT COULD STRIKE UP THE SMALLER COULD IMPACT UP THE SMALLER EXAMINATION UP THE KAZOO. INVESTIGATION UP THE KAZOO. > > CAN I STOP YOU THERE? > > CONTAINER I STOP YOU THERE? THE ACCUSATION, AS YOU THE ALLEGATION, AS YOU UNDERSTOOD IT, WAS THAT ANDREW UNDERSTOOD IT, WAS THAT ANDREW WISEMAN, AMONG >> THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS WISEMAN, AMONG THE PROSECUTORS ON THE MUELLER GROUP, HAD HAD AN ON THE MUELLER TEAM, HAD HAD AN COMMUNICATION WITH DIMITRI COMMUNICATION WITH DIMITRI FIRTASH, WHICH INTERACTION FIRTASH, WHICH COMMUNICATION MR.SOLOMON WAS PHRASE WOULD MR. SOLOMON WAS EXPRESSION WOULD DISCREDIT THE MUELLER DISCREDIT THE MUELLER EXAMINATION. INVESTIGATION. > > CORRECT. > > CORRECT. WE WERE BASICALLY TRYASKED TO TR WE WERE BASICALLY TRYASKED TO TR TO DEVELOP A CONNECTION. TO DEVELOP A CONNECTION. > > REQUIREMENTS TO REJECT > > SPEC TO DISCREDIT THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. >> THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. > > I WAS OFFERING SPECIFIC > > I WAS OFFERING CERTAIN PAPERS BY SOLOMON TO VALIDATE DOCUMENTS BY SOLOMON TO VALIDATE TO FIRTASH THAT I WAS IN THE TO FIRTASH THAT I WAS IN THE LOOP.LOOP. HE DIDN’T SIMPLY SEE ANYONE. HE DIDN’T SIMPLY SEE ANYBODY. >> IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO SATISFY >> WITH IT’S DIFFICULT TO MEET WITH HIM. HIM. WE HAD TO GUARANTEE FIRTASH WE HAD TO GUARANTEE FIRTASH SOMETHING. SOMETHING. IT WAS BASICALLY TELLING
HIM WE IT WAS BASICALLY TELLING HIM WE KNEW HIS SITUATION IS WORTHLESS BELOW UNDERSTOOD HIS INSTANCE WEARS RIGHT HERE WHICH HE’S BEING PROSECUTED WHICH HE’S BEING PROSECUTED FOR NO FACTOR AND ALSO BASICALLY IT FOR NO REASON AND ALSO BASICALLY IT COULD GET TAKEN CARE OF. COULD OBTAIN TAKEN TREATMENT OF. > > THAT WAS YOUR OFFER TO MR. > > THAT WAS YOUR DEAL TO MR. FIRTASH, WE CANISTER GET THE INSTANCE FIRTASH, WE CAN GET THE CASE WENT DOWN. DROPPED. > > YOUR EXTRADITION INSTANCE, YES. > > YOUR EXTRADITION CASE, YES. > > > SO THE EXCHANGE WITH MR. > > > SO THE EXCHANGE WITH MR.FIRTASH WOULD BE YOU PROVIDE US FIRTASH WOULD BE YOU GIVE United States INFORMATION THAT WOULD BE INFO THAT WOULD BE HARMFUL TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC ASSUMPTION OF THE MUELLER UNDERSTANDING OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION,> AND WE IN TURN EXAMINATION, AND >>> WE CONSEQUENTLY WILL OBTAIN YOUR CASE >>> DROPPED AT WILL OBTAIN YOUR SITUATION DROPPED AT THE DOJ. THE DOJ. > > THAT’S HOW IT BEGAN. > > THAT’S HOW IT BEGAN. > > > THEY WERE GOING TO END UP BEING > > > THEY WERE GOING TO BECOME LAWYERS TO EFFECTUATE THIS LAWYERS TO EFFECTUATE THIS TRADE? TRADE? > > CORRECT. > > CORRECT. > > > YOU WERE EXPECTED TO BROKER > > > YOU WERE MEANT TO BROKER THIS? THIS? > > CORRECT. > > CORRECT. > > > WHAT’S THIS $100,000 A > > > WHAT’S THIS$100,000 A MONTH? MONTH?> > > THAT WAS EXPENDITURES FOR THEM. > > THAT WAS EXPENDITURES FOR THEM. > >>> YOU WERE SUPPOSE TO PERFORM > > YOU >>> WERE SUPPOSE TO ACCOMPLISH NEGOTIATE WHAT THEY WERE GETTING BARGAIN WHAT THEY WERE GETTING PAID? PAID? >> >
>> > MINE IS NOT THIS THERE. > > MINE IS NOT THIS THERE. MINE WAS >>> $200,000. MINE WAS $200,000. > > WHAT’S THAT >> NEXT LINE >>? > > WHAT’S >>> THAT NEXT LINE? IS THAT THE >>> FOUNDER OF BURISMA? IS THAT THE OWNER OF BURISMA? > >> > YES. > > YES. >> > > > WHAT ARE YOU INTENDED >> TO BE > > > WHAT ARE YOU INTENDED TO BE RECEIVING FROM LANNY DAVIS AS WELL AS MR. ACQUIRING FROM LANNY DAVIS AND MR. FIRTASH? FIRTASH? > >> APPARENTLY JOHN SOLOMON SAID > > APPARENTLY JOHN SOLOMON CLAIMED THERE WAS SOMETHING IN THE EVENT THERE WAS >> SOMETHING IN THE >> INSTANCE CONCERNING THAT.ABOUT THAT. > > TO MAKE SURE THAT’S WHY THIS WAS ALL > > TO ENSURE THAT’S WHY THIS WAS ALL ONE DISCUSSION WITH MR. >> RUDY >>> ONE CONVERSATION WITH MR. RUDY GIULIANI. GIULIANI. > > CORRECT. > > CORRECT. > > ANNOUNCING THE BIDEN > > ANNOUNCING THE BIDEN INVESTIGATION AND ALSO DISCUSSING INVESTIGATION> AS WELL AS SPEAKING ABOUT GETTING FIRTASH OFF FROM THIS GETTING FIRTASH OFF FROM THIS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DIVISION OF JUSTICE PROSECUTION, THESE WERE PROSECUTION, THESE WERE CONNECTED? CONNECTED? > > IT WAS ALL ATTACHED. > > IT WAS ALL> CONNECTED. AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE AGENDA WAS TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE AGENDA WAS TO ENSURE >> THAT THE UKRAINIANS ANNOUNCED >> THE BIDEN >> UKRAINIANS ANNOUNCED THE BIDEN DEVELOPMENT. ADVANCE. > > > SO A TRADITIONAL > > > SO A TRADITIONAL REPORTER, JOHN SOL MAN, AND ALSO JOURNALIST, JOHN SOL MALE, AND ALSO 2 FOX INFORMATION LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, AND ALSO RUDY 2 FOX INFORMATION LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, AND ALSO RUDY GIULIANI AND ALSO LEV PARNAS ARE ALL GIULIANI AS WELL AS LEV PARNAS ARE >> DONE IN THE INFORMING, IN AN INITIATIVE TO IN THE INFORMING, IN AN EFFORT TO GET THE HELP OF A ENLIST THE AIDS OF A BILLIONAIRE, KREMLIN-CONNECTED, BILLIONAIRE, KREMLIN-CONNECTED, PURPORTEDLY JOSTLED UP OLIGARCH, TO PURPORTEDLY SET UPON UP OLIGARCH, TO ENABLE THEM TO STRESS THE> ENABLE THEM TO STRESS >>> THE UKRAINIANS. UKRAINIANS. THE OLIGARCH AND HIS TEAM INFORMS THE OLIGARCH AND ALSO HIS TEAM TELLS THE MOTLEY CRUE HE CONTAINER ASSIST WITH THE MOTLEY CRUE HE CAN ASSIST WITH GETTING THAT.GETTING THAT. HE CAN ALSO ASSISTANCE THEM DISCREDIT HE CAN ALSO HELP THEM DISCREDIT THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. THEY SAY THAT WOULD BE EXCELLENT. THEY SAY THAT WOULD BE TERRIFIC. WHAT WE HAVE TO OFFER YOU IN WHAT WE HAVE TO OFFER YOU IN EXCHANGE IS WE CONTAINER HELP QUIT YOU EXCHANGE IS WE CANISTER ASSIST QUIT YOU FROM BEING EXTRADITED TO THE FROM BEING EXTRADITED TO THE UNITED STATES TO FACE FELONY UNITED STATES TO FACE FELONY CORRUPTION CHARGES FROM THE U.S.CORRUPTION CHARGES FROM THE U.S. DIVISION OF JUSTICE.DIVISION OF JUSTICE. “” THE WASHINGTON MESSAGE”” JUST THIS “” THE WASHINGTON MESSAGE”” SIMPLY THIS MID-DAY DOCUMENTS THAT MR. MID-DAY RECORDS THAT MR. GIULIANI’S INVOLVED WITH MR. GIULIANI’S INVOLVED WITH MR. FIRTASH, AND ALSO HIS TYPE OF GROUP, FIRTASH, AND HIS KIND OF GROUP, SEEMS AN ONGOING APPEARS TO BE AN ONGOING ISSUE. WORRY. LEV PARNAS SAID HIS TEAM’S LEV PARNAS CLAIMED HIS GROUP’S CAMPAIGNING FOR TO OBTAIN THE SITUATION ADVOCACY TO GET THE CASE WENT DOWN, DID COPULATE TO DROPPED, DID COPULATE TO LAWYER GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, AND ALSO HE CLAIMS THAT ATTORNEY AS WELL AS HE SAYS THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR WAS EVEN MORE COMMONLY BASIC BARR WAS MORE WIDELY CHECKED OUT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING. READ KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING. DID YOU HAVE EVER BEFORE SATISFYING WITH DID YOU HAVE EVER BEFORE CONSULTING WITH OR INTEREST INTERACTION WITH HIS OR PASSION COMMUNICATION WITH HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE United States BARR? CHIEF LAW OFFICER BARR? >> > > I DID NOT PERSONALLY TALKED TO >> > > I DID NOT PERSONALLY SPOKE WITH HIM, BUT I WAS INVOLVED IN LOTS HIM, BUT I WAS INVOLVED IN SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS THAT JOE OF CONVERSATIONS THAT JOE diGENOVA DID, RUDY GIULIANI IT diGENOVA DID, RUDY GIULIANI IT BEFORE ME, AND ESTABLISHING UP BEFORE ME, AND ESTABLISHING MEETINGS WITH– CONFERENCES WITH– >> > > DO YOU RECOGNIZE IF RUDY GIULIANI >> > > DO YOU UNDERSTAND IF RUDY GIULIANI WAS EVER TOUCHING MR.WAS EVER IN GET IN TOUCH WITH WITH MR. BARR, PARTICULARLY CONCERNING THE BARR, SPECIFICALLY CONCERNING THE FACT THAT HE WAS TRYING TO GET REALITY THAT HE WAS WANTING TO GET UKRAINE TO REVEAL THEY UKRAINE TO REVEAL THEY EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN? EXAMINATION INTO JOE BIDEN? >> > > ABSOLUTELY >>. >> > > DEFINITELY. > > MR. BARR >> UNDERSTOOD ABOUT IT? >> > > MR. BARR UNDERSTOOD REGARDING IT? > > MR. BARR HAD TO HAVE KNOWN > > MR. BARR NEEDED TO HAVE KNOWN EVERY LITTLE THING. EVERYTHING. >> IT’S GLOBAL. IT’S GLOBAL. > > DID RUDY GIULIANI INFORM YOU> HE > > DID RUDY GIULIANI TELL YOU HE HAD SPOKEN TO THE LAWYER HAD SPOKEN TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE United States PARTICULARLY? GENERAL ESPECIALLY? >> > > NOT ONLY RUDY GIULIANI, >> > > NOT ONLY RUDY GIULIANI, VICTORIA AND JOE, THEY WERE ALL VICTORIA AND ALSO JOE, THEY WERE ALL BUDDIES. BEST BUDDIES. BARR WAS– CHIEF LAW OFFICER BARR WAS– ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR WAS BASICALLY ON THE TEAM. BARR WAS BASICALLY ON THE GROUP. >> > > WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AS WELL AS >> > > WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND ALSO PRESIDENT ZELENSKY SPOKE IN HEAD OF STATE ZELENSKY SPOKE IN JULY, WE NO FROM THE WHO YOU JULY, WE NO FROM THE WHO YOU NOTES OF THE TELEPHONE CALL, PRESIDENT NOTES OF THE TELEPHONE CALL, PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD MR.ZELENSKY HE TRUMP
TOLD MR. ZELENSKY HE OUGHT TO CALL MR. WILLIAM BARR MUST SPEAK TO MR. WILLIAM BARR ABOUT THESE INVESTIGATIONS THAT REGARDING THESE INVESTIGATIONS THAT HE DESIRED HIM TO DO. HE DESIRED HIM TO DO. > > CORRECT. >> > > CORRECT >>. >> > > THAT STRUCK A GREAT DEAL OF INDIVIDUALS >> > > THAT STRUCK A GREAT DEAL OF PEOPLE AS ADJUSTMENT. AS ADJUSTMENT. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE United States BRAR WAS CHIEF LAW OFFICER BRAR WAS REPORTEDLY TROUBLE, DIDN’T KNOW REPORTEDLY UPSET, DIDN’T KNOW WHY HE WOULD BE MENTIONED, BUT WHY HE WOULD BE MENTIONED, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE IT MAKES GOOD SENSE TO IT SEEMS LIKE IT MAKES SENSE TO YOU. YOU. >> > > ABSOLUTELY >>. > > ABSOLUTELY. WE KNEW ABOUT THE EXAMINATION, WE KNEW ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION, AND ATTORNEY BASIC BARR DESIRED AS WELL AS CHIEF LAW OFFICER BARR WISHED TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TO OBTAIN TO THE BASES OF THE BIDEN STUFF.BIDEN STUFF.
I THINK HE MIGHT HAVE GOT DISMAYED I BELIEVE HE MAY HAVE GOT UPSET THAT TRUMP CHATTED– THE THAT TRUMP TALKED– THE HEAD OF STATE OUSTED HIM, MAYBE, HE PRESIDENT OUSTED HIM, MAYBE, HE DIDN’T INTEND TO BE IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC DIDN’T WANT TO BE IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC EYE, BUT IT WAS KNOWN INSIDE EYE, BUT IT WAS KNOWN INSIDE THAT HE WAS INVESTIGATING THE THAT HE WAS EXPLORING THE DETECTIVES. DETECTIVES. >> > > DO YOU UNDERSTAND IF ATTORNEY >> > > DO YOU RECOGNIZE IF CHIEF LAW OFFICER WILLIAM BARR EVERY SPOKE GENERAL WILLIAM BARR EVERY SPOKE TO ANY UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES? WITH ANY UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES? >> > > I DON’T RECALL AT THIS >> > > I DON’T RECALL AT THIS MOMENT.MOMENT.
I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT MY TEXT I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK OUT MY TEXT MESSAGES AND ALSO SEE. MESSAGES AND SEE. >>> > > > WE CONTACTED THE JUSTICE >>> > > > WE SPOKEN TO THE JUSTICE DIVISION FOR DISCUSS MR. DEPARTMENT FOR REMARK ON MR. PARNAS’ EAT PARNAS’ PECK AT THE JUSTICE DIVISION DID PROVIDE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DID OFFER US An ACTION T. IS A. US A FEEDBACK T. IS A. IT IS A TWO-WORD RESPONSE, IT IS A TWO-WORD REACTION, TECHNICALLY ONE NUMBER AND ONE TECHNICALLY ONE NUMBER AND ALSO ONE WORD. WORD. SHE TOLD United States, QUOTE, 100% FALSE. >>> > > > TODAY THE IMPEACHMENT >>> > > > TODAY THE IMPEACHMENT POSTS WERE CONVEYED FROM THE SHORT ARTICLES WERE CONVEYED FROM THE UNITED STATE RESIDENCE TO THE U.S. US SENATE. U.S. RESIDENCE TO THE UNITED STATE SENATE. US SENATE TEST RESULTS FROM OFFICIALLY SENATE TRIAL IS CHARGE TO FORMALLY BEGIN TOMORROW. BEGINNING TOMORROW. ONE OF THE UNCOMFORTABLE REVELATIONS ONE OF THE AWKWARD REVELATIONS IN THIS SAGA IS THAT WHILE THE IN THIS LEGEND IS THAT WHILE THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE IN THE KNOWLEDGE COMMITTEE IN YOUR HOME WAS LEADING THE HOUSE WAS LEADING THE INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPEACHMENT SCAN SCAN RUMOR, IT EMERGED THAT THE TOP DETRACTION, IT ARISED THAT THE TOP REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN MEMBER OF CONGRESS ON REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN MEMBER OF CONGRESS ON THAT BOARD, CONGRESSMAN THAT COMMITTEE, CONGRESSMAN DEVIN NUNES ON THE GOLDEN STATE DEVIN NUNES ON CALIFORNIA APPEARED HIMSELF TOCHB TO HAVE APPEARED HIMSELF TOCHB TO HAVE BEEN CONNECTED TO INDIVIDUALS BEEN ATTACHED TO INDIVIDUAL INVOLVED IN THE RUMOR AND ALSO INCLUDED IN THE DETRACTION AND ALSO POSSIBLY TO THE DETRACTION POTENTIALLY TO THE SCANDAL ITSELF.ITSELF.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT CONGRESSMAN NUNES HAS SINCE CONGRESSMAN NUNES HAS BEEN OPENLY REALLY VAGUE AS WELL AS BEEN OPENLY VERY UNCLEAR AND DEFENSIVE REGARDING WHETHER HE DEFENSIVE ABOUT WHETHER HE REMEMBERS ANY OF HIS OWN KEEPS IN MIND ANY OF HIS OWN COMMUNICATIONS WITH LEV PARNAS COMMUNICATIONS WITH LEV PARNAS THROUGHOUT THE TIME THIS UKRAINE DURING THE TIME THIS UKRAINE SCHEME WAS UNDERWAY, I ASKED MR. SCHEME WAS UNDERWAY, I ASKED MR. PARNAS TODAY IF HE KEEPS IN MIND ANY PARNAS TODAY IF HE BEARS IN MIND ANY INTERACTIONS WITH CONGRESSMAN INTERACTIONS WITH CONGRESSMAN NUNES. NUNES. >> > > DO YOU UNDERSTAND CONGRESSMAN DEVIN >> > > DO YOU RECOGNIZE CONGRESSMAN DEVIN NUNES? NUNES? >> > > YES, I DO >>.
>> > > YES, I DO. > > WHAT’S BEEN YOUR RELATIONSHIP > > WHAT’S BEEN YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM? WITH HIM? >> > > WE DON’T HAVE WAY TOO MUCH OF A >> > > WE DON’T HAVE TOO MUCH OF A CONNECTION. RELATIONSHIP. WE MET SEVERAL TIMES AT THE WE MET SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TRUMP RESORT, BUT OUR TRUMP HOTEL, BUT OUR RELATIONSHIP STARTED GETTING PARTNERSHIP STARTED OBTAINING BASICALLY WHERE IT EXPANDED WAS BASICALLY WHERE IT INCREASED WAS WHEN I WAS SPROINTRODUCED TO HIS WHEN I WAS SPROINTRODUCED TO HIS ASSISTANT, DARA CARVEY, AS WELL AS THE ASSISTANT, DARA CARVEY, AS WELL AS THE REASON THAT DARA CARVEY I WAS REASON DARA CARVEY I WAS TOLD BECAUSE DEVIN NUNES HAD ACTUALLY AN TOLD DUE TO THE FACT THAT DEVIN NUNES HAD AN VALUES, AN ETHICS BOARD, HE ETHICS, AN ETHICS BOARD, HE COULDN’T REMAIN IN THE SPOTLIGHT.COULDN ‘T REMAIN IN THE SPOTLIGHT. HE WAS KIND OF SHUNNED A LITTLE HE WAS KIND OF SHUNNED A LITTLE BIT AS WELL AS THAT HE WAS LOOKING INTO LITTLE BIT WHICH HE WAS LOOKING INTO THIS UKRAINE STUFF LIKEWISE, DESIRED THIS UKRAINE STUFF LIKEWISE, WANTED TO HELP OUT. TO ASSIST. THEY PROVIDED ME DA ARE,. THEY PROVIDED ME DA ARE,. >> > > YOU INFORMED MR. HARVEY WHAT YOU >> > > YOU TOLD MR. HARVEY WHAT YOU WERE FUNCTIONING ON IN UKRAINE? WERE WORKING ON IN UKRAINE? >> > > HE WAS AWARE OF THAT ALREADY. >> > > HE RECOGNIZED THAT ALREADY. HE UNDERSTOOD EVERY LITTLE THING. HE RECOGNIZED EVERYTHING. >> > > HE CURRENTLY KNEW THAT BY THE >> > > HE ALREADY UNDERSTOOD THAT BY THE TIME HE TALKED TO YOU. TIME HE CHATTED TO YOU. >> > > HE HAD A WHOLE LOT OF >> INFO > > HE HAD A GREAT DEAL OF INFO ALREADY. >> ALREADY. > > DO YOU THINK HE ‘D GOTTEN > > DO YOU BELIEVE HE ‘D GOTTEN THAT DETAILS FROM MR. THAT INFORMATION FROM MR. GIULIANI? GIULIANI? >> > > I BELIEVE THAT THEY– LIKE I >> > > I ASSUME THAT THEY– LIKE I CLAIMED, THERE WAS OTHER INDIVIDUAL SAID, THERE WAS OTHER INDIVIDUAL DOING SUCH AS THIS OP RESEARCH OR DOING LIKE THIS OP STUDY OR WHATEVER, I DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU WHATEVER, I DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU CALL IT, BUT IT WAS COMING FROM REFER TO IT AS, BUT IT WAS COMING FROM DIFFERENT SIDES, YEAH.DIFFERENT SIDES
, YEAH. >> > > GIVEN THAT INTERACTION THAT >> > > GIVEN THAT COMMUNICATION THAT YOU JUST DEFINED WITH YOU JUST DEFINED WITH CONGRESSMAN NUNES AS WELL AS HIS ASSISTANT, CONGRESSMAN NUNES AND ALSO HIS AIDE, MR. HARVEY, DOES IT STRIKE YOU MR. HARVEY, DOES IT STRIKE YOU AS UNUSUAL OR INAPPROPRIATE THAT AS UNUSUAL OR INAPPROPRIATE THAT DEVIN NUNES WOULD BE AMONG THE DEVIN NUNES WOULD BE JUST ONE OF THE LEAD PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS RIGHT INTO THIS LEAD DETECTIVES INTO THIS DETRACTION ON THE HOUSE RUMOR ON THE HOME KNOWLEDGE BOARD? INTELLIGENCE BOARD? HE’S OBVIOUSLY THE TOP HE’S OBVIOUSLY THE TOP REPUBLICAN ON THAT PARTICULAR BOARD? REPUBLICAN ON THAT PARTICULAR BOARD? >> > > I WAS >> IN SHOCK WHEN I WAS > > I REMAINED IN SHOCK WHEN I WAS ENJOYING THE HEARINGS AND WHEN I ENJOYING THE HEARINGS AND ALSO WHEN I SAW DEVIN NUNES STAYING UP SAW DEVIN NUNES RESTING UP THERE, AND AFTER THAT THERE WAS A THERE, AND AFTERWARDS THERE WAS A PICTURE IN WHICH HARVEY WAS IN BACK IMAGE WHERE HARVEY WAS IN BACK SITTING.SITTING. I TEXTED MY LAWYER I CAN’T I TEXTED MY LAWYER I CAN’T BELIEVE THIS IS HAPPENING. BELIEVE THIS IS HAPPENING. >> > > BECAUSE >>? >> > > BECAUSE? > > DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY WERE ENTAILED IN > > BECAUSE THEY WERE INCLUDED IN OBTAINING ALL THIS STUFF ON BIDEN. OBTAINING ALL THIS THINGS ON BIDEN. I IMPLY, DEREK HARVEY HAD SEVERAL I INDICATE, DEREK HARVEY HAD SEVERAL SKYPE MEETINGS I SET UP WITH SKYPE MEETINGS I ESTABLISH WITH DIFFERENT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS LIKE VARIOUS DISTRICT ATTORNEYS LIKE HALADITS HALADITS HALADITSKY, THE CORRUPTION HALADITSKY, THE CORRUPTION DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN UKRAINE, SO IT’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN UKRAINE, SO IT’S DIFFICULT TO SEE THEM EXIST LIKE THAT DIFFICULT TO SEE THEM LIE LIKE THAT WHEN YOU KNOW IT resembles THAT WHEN YOU KNOW IT’S LIKE THAT FRIGHTENING BECAUSE YOU RECOGNIZE, HE WAS TERRIFYING SINCE YOU UNDERSTAND, HE WAS SITTING THERE AS WELL AS MAKING ALL RESTING THERE AS WELL AS MAKING ALL THESE STATEMENTS AS WELL AS ALL THAT THESE STATEMENTS AS WELL AS ALL THAT WHEN HE UNDERSTOOD REALLY WELL THAT HE WHEN HE RECOGNIZED EFFECTIVELY THAT HE RECOGNIZED WHAT WAS GOING ON.KNEW WHAT WAS
HAPPENING. HE UNDERSTOOD WHAT’S HAPPENING. HE RECOGNIZED WHAT’S HAPPENING. HE RECOGNIZES THAT I AM. HE RECOGNIZES THAT I AM. >> > > ONCE MORE, CONGRESSMAN DEVIN >> > > ONCE MORE, CONGRESSMAN DEVIN NUNES IS THE LEADING REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN ON NUNES IS THE TOP REPUBLICAN ON THE KNOWLEDGE BOARD, THE INTELLIGENCE BOARD, WHICH IS THE BOARD THAT WHICH IS THE COMMITTEE THAT EXAMINED THE UKRAINE INVESTIGATED THE UKRAINE SCANDAL. SCANDAL. LEV PARNAS SAYS THAT MR. NUNES LEV PARNAS STATES THAT MR. NUNES AS WELL AS HIS LEADING STAFFER WERE AS WELL AS HIS LEADING STAFFER WERE ACTUALLY INVOLVED IN THE UKRAINE ACTUALLY INVOLVED IN THE UKRAINE DETRACTION IN THE FEELING THAT THEY RUMOR IN THE SENSE THAT THEY WERE INVOLVED IN THE EFFORT TO WERE INVOLVED IN THE INITIATIVE TO TRY TO GIN UP A CORRUPTION SHOT TO GIN UP A CORRUPTION RUMOR FOR JOE BIDEN IN SCANDAL FOR JOE BIDEN IN UKRAINE.UKRAINE.
MR. PARNAS SAYS HE ASSISTED THEM TO MR. PARNAS SAYS HE ASSISTED THEM TO BECAUSE EFFORT. IN THAT INITIATIVE. WE CONTACTED CONGRESSMAN NUNES’S WE CONTACTED CONGRESSMAN NUNES’S OFFICE FOR REMARK TONIGHT. WORKPLACE FOR COMMENT TONIGHT. WE DID NOT OBTAIN ANY REPLY >> > > YOU ELEVATED THE ISSUE OF >> > > YOU INCREASED THE PROBLEM OF AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH TO AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH TO HEAD OF STATE TRUMP TELLING HIM THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP TELLING HIM THAT HE SHOULD ELIMINATE HER? HE SHOULD REMOVE HER? >> > > I DIDN’T SAY DO AWAY WITH HER. >> > > I DIDN’T SAY DO AWAY WITH HER. I INFORMED HIM SHE’S POOR MOUTHING I TOLD HIM SHE’S NEGATIVE MOUTHING HIM. HIM. >> > > DO YOU ACTUALLY THINK HE >> > > DO YOU IN FACT BELIEVE HE DID BAD MOUTH HIM AND SAY BAD DID BAD MOUTH HIM AND SAY BAD THINGS REGARDING HIM, OR DO YOU FEATURE OF HIM, OR DO YOU BELIEVE THIS BELONGED TO THIS THINK THIS WAS PART OF THIS DISINFORMATION PROJECT? DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN? >> > > I DON’T BELIEVE> IT. > > I DON’T BELIEVE IT. THAT’S WHY I WISH TO ASK FORGIVENESS THAT’S WHY I DESIRE TO ASK FORGIVENESS TO HER BECAUSE THEN I TO HER BECAUSE THEN I BELIEVED IT, BUT I DON’T BELIEVE THOUGHT IT, BUT I DON’T BELIEVE IT CURRENTLY AFTER RE-EVALUATING AS WELL AS IT NOW AFTER RE-EVALUATING AND ALSO SEEING EVERYTHING THAT SEEING EVERYTHING THAT TRANSPIRED, LOOKING AT THE TRANSPIRED, CONSIDERING THE DOCUMENTS AGAIN.DOCUMENTATION ONCE MORE.
> > I DID NOT ANTICIPATE THAT LEV > > I DID NOT ANTICIPATE THAT LEV >> PARNAS WOULD WISHED TO USAGE THIS PARNAS WOULD INTENDED TO USAGE THIS INTERVIEW TODAY TO ASK FORGIVENESS TO MEETING TODAY TO SAY SORRY TO AMBASSADOR MARIE YOVANOVITCH FOR AMBASSADOR MARIE YOVANOVITCH FOR HIS ROLE IN THE INITIATIVE TO SMEAR HIS FUNCTION IN THE INITIATIVE TO SMEAR HER AND ALSO GET HER TERMINATED, BUT HE HER AND ALSO GET HER DISCHARGED, BUT HE DID THAT. DID THAT. THE BROADER CONTEXT MR. PARNAS THE BROADER CONTEXT MR. PARNAS WAS SIMPLY DISCUSSING THERE IS WAS JUST SPEAKING CONCERNING THERE IS WHAT HE SAYS WAS A PERSONAL WHAT HE SAYS WAS A PERSONAL COMMUNICATION HE HAD WITH COMMUNICATION HE HAD WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP IN WHICH HE SAYS HEAD OF STATE TRUMP IN WHICH HE STATES HE OBSERVED PRESIDENT TRUMP HE OBSERVED HEAD OF STATE TRUMP PERSONALLY PURCHASING THE DISCHARGING PERSONALLY ORDERING THE TERMINATING OF MARIE YOVANOVITCH.OF MARIE YOVANOVITCH
. WE WILL HAVE MORE ON THAT PARTICULAR IN WE WILL CERTAINLY HAVE MORE ON THAT IN COMPONENT TWO OF THE LEV PARNAS SEQUEL OF THE LEV PARNAS INTERVIEW TOMORROW EVENING. INTERVIEW TOMORROW EVENING. WE’LL ALSO HAVE EVEN MORE FOR YOU WE’LL ALSO HAVE MORE FOR YOU TOMORROW NIGHT ON WHAT MR. TOMORROW NIGHT ON WHAT MR. PARNAS ALLEGED TODAY REGARDING PARNAS ALLEGED TODAY ABOUT FORMER POWER ASSISTANT RICK FORMER POWER SECRETARY RICK PERRY AND CURRENT ASSISTANT OF PERRY AND ALSO CURRENT ASSISTANT OF STATE MIKE POMPEO. SPECIFY MIKE POMPEO. WE’RE DOING A LITTLE EVEN MORE WE’RE DOING A LITTLE EVEN MORE REPORTING ON THOSE ALLEGATIONS REPORTING ON THOSE CLAIMS AND CLAIMS, WE’RE LOOKING, IN AS WELL AS ASSERTS, WE’RE LOOKING, ACTUALLY, AT A FEW OF THE NEW REALITY, AT A FEW OF THE NEW DETAILS THAT BOOSTS MR.INFORMATION THAT BOLSTERS MR.
PARNAS’S INSTANCE WHICH WAS SIMPLY PARNAS’S CASE WHICH WAS JUST LAUNCHED TONIGHT BY THE RELEASED TONIGHT BY THE INTELLIGENCE BOARD. KNOWLEDGE COMMITTEE. SO AGAIN, EVEN MORE ON THAT PARTICULAR TOMORROW SO ONCE MORE, EVEN MORE ON THAT PARTICULAR TOMORROW IN PART 2 OF THIS INTERVIEW. PARTIALLY TWO OF THIS MEETING. I DO PRIOR TO I GO NEED TO I DO PRIOR TO I GO WISH TO BRING YOU SOME NEWS WE JUST GOT BRING YOU SOME INFORMATION WE SIMPLY GOT MOMENTS BACK WHILE WE HAVE BEEN MOMENTS AGO WHILE WE HAVE BEEN ON THE AIR TONIGHT IN THE PAST ON THE AIR TONIGHT IN THE PREVIOUS COUPLE OF MINUTES, WE GOT A NUMBER OF MINUTES, WE GOT A REACTION FROM PREVIOUS NEW YORK CITY ACTION FROM FORMER NEW YORK CITY CITY MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI TO CITY MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI TO SOMETHING MR. PARNAS TOLD United States IN SOMETHING MR. PARNAS INFORMED United States IN TODAY’S INTERVIEW. TODAY’S INTERVIEW. YOU SAW MR. PARNAS SAY ON THE YOU SAW MR. PARNAS SAY ON THE AIR GIULIANI HAD MADE AIR GIULIANI HAD MADE INTRODUCTIONS FOR HIM WITH INTRODUCTIONS FOR HIM WITH UKRAINE OFFICIALS IN WHICH HE UKRAINE AUTHORITIES IN WHICH HE INFORMED THE UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES INFORMED THE UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS THAT MR.PARNAS SPOKE AS A THAT MR. PARNAS TALKED AS A REP OF HEAD OF STATE REPRESENTATIVE OF HEAD OF STATE TRUMP. TRUMP. MR. GIULIANI DENIED TO US THAT MR. GIULIANI REFUTED TO US THAT HE EVER BEFORE DID THAT, ASKED WHETHER HE EVER DID THAT, ASKED WHETHER MR. PARNAS WAS SPEAKING ON MR. PARNAS WAS TALKING ON PART OF THE HEAD OF STATE ON BEHALF OF THE HEAD OF STATE IN UKRAINE, MAYOR GIULIANI INFORMED US UKRAINE, MAYOR GIULIANI INFORMED United States TONIGHT, QUOTE, NEVER. TONIGHT, QUOTE, NEVER. HE LIKEWISE CALLED MR. PARNAS A,.
Free Discount Prescription Drug Coupons
