>>> > > > FUTURES, HIGHS RIGD e1j JOINING United States FOR A MUCH DEEPER CONSIDER THE MARKETS, JEREMY SIEGEL, PROFESSOR EMERITUSw3r # INSTITUTIONS OF heBUSINESS. I WAS TRYING TO DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF TIME YOU)jt REALLY BEENw3 THE TABLEV STOP. IN DOING THE WRONG THINGS. YOU DIDN'' T SAY THAT RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING.çó I ASSUME YOU CRITICIZED THE FED AND LETTING THE CASH SUPPLY GROW, BUT THEN YOU SAIDr WRONG-MINDED WHAT THEY'' RE DOImfá HOW MANY OF THEÑ OF “”V!REASES, HOW MANYxD DO YOU BELIEVE THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE? WHEN SHOULD THEY HAVE STOPPED? ñOW LONG AGO INÑi!U ■ YOUR SIGHT? >>> > çó OH, YEAH, I IMPLY, t( I THINO THEY OUGHT TO HAVE STOPPEDçóçóÑi D LAST AUTUMN. RIGHT. I STARTED BATTERING THE TABLEXX # ACTUALLY LAST LOSS CLAIMING THEY'' RE INA5 ■ çóxDe1xD RISK OF OVERTIGHTENING, as well as It(e1 AM NOr SURPRISED AT THE ç2EVELOPMENTS, ANDçó ÑiJOE, LET'' S BEjFjFe1 qEX.BECAUSE Ii] CHECKED OUT THE FORECT OF THE ÑiFED, THE FED IS PROJECTING NEGATIVE GDPç ■ i kt( OVER THE NEXTwcie1 THREE QUARTE, BY THE ÑiWAY, q NOT SIMPLY r FORECASTING, STATING THAT WOULD xD DESIRABLE–ND THE MOSTxD DESIRABLE MONETARY POLICY. FORECASTlpxD FOR THE YEAR 2023,% GDP DEVELOPMENT. WELL, THE FIRST lpQUARTER, j+k WW THE ONLY MEANS YOU GETw3 TO THExD FORECAST IS okNEGATIVE, NEGATIV GROWTH. THAT'' S An ECONOMIC DOWNTURN. I MEAN, THIS ISw3qJ ■ UNPRECEDENT AS WELL AS THE ONLYt( MEANS YOU?$ú ■ xD GOD GET unfavorable GROWTHçór HAVEr xD I INDICATE, OVER 9 MONTHS. I IMPLY, ñr çóCHAIRMAN POWELL DID EVEN MENTION fáTHAT.xD nobody IN JOURNALISMS CORPS O5Upt(fJ$Uzi] ME AS ONEÑi OF TH TERRIFYING FORECASTAó THE FED HAS EVER BEFORE PUT OUT, xD ANDfá GENER NOT IN– NOT IN4 THE ECONOMY, WE WERE TALKING A MINUTE AGO ABOUT THEi] DUALlp required. YOU KNOW, I'' VE BEEN PHRASE THAT THEY BASICALLY BEAT INFLATION LATE IN 2014. ELSE ISqçó GOING DOWN. THEY'' RE DONE THEIRlp Task THERE.
Free Prescription Drug Cards Coupons
