Click today to request your free ACRX discount prescription card and save up to 80% off of your medicine!

Lawrence: Trump Could Now Lose Everything Including His Freedom

0 0
Read Time:8 Minute, 51 Second

RIGHT BET, AS WE FOUND OUT. >> > > SEE THE 11TH CIRCUIT RULING. >> > > ALL RIGHT LAWRENCE, ALL BE VIEWING. >> > > THANK YOU, ALEX. WELL, THE 2 WORST NIGHTS OF DONALD TRUMP THUS FAR ARE ELECTION NIGHT 2020, AND ALSO TONIGHT. ON ELECTION EVENING, WHEN FOX CALLED THE POLITICAL ELECTION FOR JOE BIDEN, HE RECOGNIZED AFTER THAT HE WAS GOING TO SHED ACCESSIBILITY TO THE WHITE HOME AND ALSO TO AIR COMPEL ONE. WHICH'' S ALL THE PRESIDENCY WAS TO HIM. BUT TONIGHT, DONALD TRUMP IS LOOKING AT THE OPPORTUNITY OF LOSING EVERYTHING. LOSING EVERY LITTLE THING, INCLUDING HIS FLEXIBILITY. DONALD TRUMP BEGAN HIS DAY BY GETTING HIT WITH ONE OF THE MOST HUGE CLAIM HE'' S EVER FACED, A LEGAL ACTION THAT COULD WIPE HIM OUT, AND BANKRUPT HIS ADULT YOUNGSTERS. AND ALSO DONALD TRUMP ENDED HIS DAY ABOUT TWO HRS BACK BY GETTING ENTIRELY SQUASHED, AND ALSO I MEAN CRUSHED, BY A FEDERAL APPEALS COURT IN A 29-PAGE POINT OF VIEW AS WELL AS ORDER CITING ENTIRELY WITH FEDERAL DISTRICT ATTORNEYS VERSUS DONALD TRUMP IN THE INSTANCE OF DONALD J TRUMP FIRST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AS WELL AS WE HAVE SPENT THE LAST FEW WEEKS WORRYING, HONESTLY WORRYING, THAT DONALD TRUMP MIGHT HAVE INFECTED THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY RELEVANT WHERE REGULATIONS DO NOT RELATE TO HIM.AND THAT

WAS THE FORMALLY STATED SETTING OF THE TRUMP APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE AILEEN MERCEDES CANNON, WHO MAKE A DECISION TO SELECT An UNIQUE MASTER TO ANALYZE ALL THE PAPERS SEIZED BY THE FBI FROM DONALD TRUMP'' S FLORIDA PART-TIME CITIZENS. BECAUSE SHE BELIEVES, AS WELL AS SHE PUT IT IN WRITING, THAT DONALD TRUMP IS ENTITLED TO SPECIAL THERAPY IN A SCENARIO LIKE THIS. SPECIAL THERAPY IN AMERICAN COURTROOMS, WHICH WAS A STUNNING CHOICE BY A GOVERNMENT COURT. AS WELL AS A SHOCKING ORDER BY A FEDERAL COURT. AS WELL AS YOU LISTENED TO A GREAT DEAL OF SHOCK ABOUT IT ON THIS PROGRAM. AND ALSO WE HAVE DEMANDED THIS PROGRAM, WAS THE CONSENTANEOUS ARRANGEMENT OF OUR LEGAL EXPERTS, THAT THE TRUMP JUDGES VIEWPOINT WAS UNTETHERED TO THE LEGISLATION. IT WAS A WORK OF LEGAL FICTION. AS WELL AS TONIGHT, A 3 JUDGE PANEL OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 11TH CIRCUIT CLAIMED, WE AGREE. THEY STATED THOSE 2 WORDS REPETITIVELY IN THE 29 PAGES.AND THEY LITERALLY MET WE AGREE WITH THE FEDERAL PROSECUTORS. THEY LITERALLY MET WE AGREE WITH EVERY WORD THE FEDERAL PROSECUTORS HAVE OFFERED TO US. AS WELL AS WE DISAGREE WITH EVERY WORD DONALD TRUMP ' S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES HAVE ACTUALLY PRESENTED TO US. AND WE DISAGREE WITH THE FEDERAL JUDGE THAT DESIGNATED A SPECIAL MASTER. BUT THAT WE AGREE? ALSO A SCHOOL STANDS, AS AUDIENCES OF THIS PROGRAM WILL RECOGNIZE, TO ME IN EFFECT THAT WE AGREE WITH ANDREW WEIZMANN, WE AGREE WITH NEIL CATCH ALL, WE AGREE WITH WITH BRADLEY MOSS, WE AGREE WITH PROFESSOR LAWRENCE– THE APPEAL COURT CONCURS WITH EVERY SPECIALIST LEGAL GAS WE ' VE HAD ON THIS PROGRAM FOR WEEKS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS CASE.THEY AGREE NOW COMPLETELY.

AND ALSO HERE IS THE PERHAPS ESSENTIAL PIECE OF THIS CONTRACT. RIGHT HERE IS THE INSPIRING COMPONENT OF THIS ARRANGEMENT, THAT DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE WORDS OF THE 29-PAGE OPINION AND ALSO ORDER. HERE IS THE FACTOR FOR HOPE. WE HOPE THAT DONALD TRUMP ' S POISONING OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS NOT AS EXTENSIVE OR SUCCESSFUL AS IT COULD HAVE BEEN. OF THE 3 JUDGES THAT ALL AGREED WITH THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS IN THIS SITUATION, AND DIFFERED WITH DONALD TRUMP, 2 OF THEM WERE ASSIGNED BY DONALD TRUMP. JUDGE ROBIN ROSENBAUM WAS APPOINTED BY COURT OBAMA. JUDGE WITH GRANT WAS APPROVED BY TRUMP. COURT ANDREW BRASHER WAS APPOINTED BY DONALD TRUMP. THEY ' RE UNANIMOUS OPINION HAS THE CLEAREST HISTORY OF THIS SITUATION YET CREATED. AND ALSO WHEN EXPLAINING THE GOVERNMENT RECORD CONFISCATED BY THE FBI AT DONALD TRUMP ' S HOUSE, THESE JURIES DID NOT SAY THAT THOSE PAPERS BELONG TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. THEY CLAIMED'THAT THE DOCUMENTS QUOTE, CORRECTLY BELONGED TO THE INDIVIDUALS OF THE UNITED STATES.THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, THAT ' S THOSE JURIES WERE WRITING THEIR VIEWPOINT FOR.

THAT ' S THAT THEY WERE PORTRAYING IN THAT POINT OF VIEW. AND BECAUSE POINT OF VIEW, THE COURTS SAID THE UNITED STATES ARGUES THAT THE DISTRICT COURT LIKELY BROADCAST IN EXERCISING ITS TERRITORY TO ADVISE THE UNITED STATES ' S USE THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN ITS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND ALSO TO CALL FOR THE UNITED STATES TO SEND THE MARKED CLASSIFIED RECORDS TO A SPECIAL MASTER FOR REVIEW. BUT, WE AGREE. THE COURT SAID THE PROSECUTOR ' S POSSIBILITY OF SUCCESS IN PURSUING THIS ALLURE IS SO HIGH THAT THEY ARE NOW CREATING'THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS SPECIFICALLY WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR, THE RIGHT TO CONTINUE UTILIZING THE CLASSIFIED FILES IN THEIR CRIMINAL EXAMINATION, AND ALSO THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO PROVIDE THOSE CLASSIFIED PAPERS TO THE SPECIAL MASTER FOR TESTIMONIAL. THE ALLURES COURT CLAIMED THAT THE AREA COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION.JUDGE CANNON ABUSED HER DISCRETION, AND SHE DID IT TO HELP DONALD TRUMP BASED ON NOTHING THAT EXISTS IN AMERICAN LAW.

THE ALLURES COURT CLAIMED THE DISTRICT COURT MADE NO MENTION IN ITS ANALYSIS AS TO WHY OR HOW LATEST TRUMP MAY HAVE AS WELL AS VISUAL INTEREST IN OR REQUIRED FOR THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS. FOR OUR PART, WE CONTAINER NOT DISCERN WHY FACTORS TRUMP WOULD HAVE AN PERSON INTEREST IN OR REQUIRED FOR ANY OF THE 100 FILES WITH CATEGORY MARKINGS. THE ALLURES COURT OPINION INCLUDED A HISTORY OF THE CATEGORY OF DOCUMENTS STARTING WITH WORLD BATTLE I. AND PRESENTED PRIMARY CONCEPTS OF CATEGORY IN INSTRUCTIONAL PASSAGES TO JUDGE CANNON, CLAIMING An INDIVIDUAL MAY HAVE ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ONLY IF, AMONG VARIOUS OTHER REQUIREMENTS, HE HAS A NEED TO KNOW THE INFORMATION. THIS NEED RELATES JUST AS TO FORMER HEAD OF STATES. THE APPEALS COURT RECOGNIZES WHAT JUDGE CANNON CLAIMED NOT TO KNOW, THAT PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS HAVE THE VERY SAME CIVIL LIBERTIES AS EVERYONE ELSE THAT IS NOT HEAD OF STATE. AND NOT WORKING IN THE GOVERNMENT. THE COURTS STATED PLAINTIVE TRUMP HAS NOT EVEN ATTEMPTED TO SHOW THAT HE HAS A REQUIREMENT TO KNOW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED AND THE CATEGORIZED DOCUMENTS.A THREE COURT PANEL WAS PAYING CLOSE INTEREST TO WHAT TOOK PLACE IN SPECIAL MASTER RAYMOND DEARIE ' S COURT ROOM IN BROOKLYN YESTERDAY.

THE JUDGES WROTE FIND OF TRUMP RECOMMENDS THAT HE MIGHT HAVE THE CLASSIFY THESE DOCUMENTS WHEN HE WAS HEAD OF STATE. BUT THE RECORD HAS NO PROOF THAT ANY OF THESE RECORDS WERE DECLASSIFIED. AS WELL AS BEFORE THE SPECIAL MASTER, POINT OF TRUMP RESISTED PROVIDING ANY PROOF THAT HE HAD DECLASSIFIED ANY ONE OF THESE PAPERS. AND IN A PANIC CONCERNING CATEGORY, TONIGHT, DONALD TRUMP ACTUALLY APPEARED ON FOX IN A DISCUSSION WITH SEAN HANNITY, CLAIMING THAT HE DID DECLASSIFY ALL OF THOSE PAPERS. AND, HE CLAIMED, HE CANISTER, HE COULD DECLASSIFY DOCUMENTS JUST PERSECUTE ASSUMING REGARDING IT.HE ACTUALLY SAID THAT. BUT, NO TRUMP LAWYERS DARE SAY ANYTHING LIKE THAT IN ANY ONE OF THESE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. AFTER EXPLAINING WHATEVER THAT WAS INCORRECT WITH DOUG CANNONS APPROACH TO THE CLASSIFIED RECORDS, THE ALLURES COURT AND AFTERWARDS STATED THAT THE CLASSIFICATION DOES NOT EVEN ISSUE ANYWAY, A MINIMUM OF FOR THESE PURPOSES, THE DECLASSIFICATION DEBATE IS A FALSE TRAIL– DECLASSIFYING AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT WOULD NOT– OR RENDER IT PERSONAL. SO, EVEN IF WE ASSUME THAT POINT OF TRUMP DID DECLASSIFY SOME OR ALL OF THE PAPERS, THAT WOULD NOT EXPLAIN WHY HE HAS A PERSONAL RATE OF INTEREST IN THEM. HE HAS ACTUALLY NOT IDENTIFIED ANY REASON THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO THEM. THE CHARMS COURT STATED THE AREA COURT ABUSED ITS DISCERNMENT IN EXERCISING JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS TRUMP ' S MOVEMENT AS IT WORRIES THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS.JUDGE CANNON ' S LEGAL THINKING ON BARRING THE FEDERAL INVESTIGATION OF THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS ORDERING THEM HANDED OVER TO An UNIQUE MASTER, THE PEELS COURT STATED, THAT ANALYSIS WAS AT FAULT. RATHER THAN SIMPLY DISBELIEVING THE FBI TESTIMONY, THAT THE FBI ' S CRIMINAL EXAMINATION'IS INEXTRICABLY LINKED WITH NATIONAL SAFETY AND SECURITY EVALUATION OF THE ABUSE OF THOSE PAPERS, THE ALLURES COURT STATED OUR TEAM BELIEVE THE FBI SWORN STATEMENT. THE APPEALS COURT RELIED SOLELY, HEAVILY, ON AN TESTIMONY GAVE BY ALLEN– JUNIOR, THE ASSISTANT SUPERVISOR OF THE COUNTER KNOWLEDGE DEPARTMENT OF THE FBI. JUDGE CANNON COMPLETELY DISMISS THIS SWORN STATEMENT. BUT THE CHARMS COURT STATED VIA COOLERS AFFIRMATION, THE UNITED STATES HAS ACTUALLY ADEQUATELY CLARIFIED HOW AS WELL AS WHY IT ' S NATIONAL SECURITY EVALUATION IS INEXPLICABLY LINKED WITH THIS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. NO EVENT HAS OFFERED ANYTHING BEYOND SUPPOSITION TO WEAKEN THE UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION, SUSTAINED BY SWORN TESTAMENT, THAT FINDINGS FROM THE CRIMINAL EXAMINATION MIGHT BE CRITICAL TO ITS NATIONAL SECURITY REVIEW. THEREFORE, THERE ' S THE ALLURES COURT.THOSE THREE COURTS CLAIMING THAT JUDGE CANNON ENGAGED IN PURE CONJECTURE, JUST PURE UNCERTAINTY. HELPED AS WELL AS ADVOCATED BY TRUMP ' S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, THAT THE FBI ' S AIDE DIRECTOR OF COUNTER KNOWLEDGE, ALLEN KOHLER, WAS SIMPLY NOT TELLING THE REALITY IN HIS AFFIDAVIT. THE APPEALS COURT WAS SHOCKED AT THAT. THE APPEALS COURT MADE A
SEARCHING FOR THAT ESSENTIALLY SUGGESTS THAT THIS INSTANCE REALLY, REALLY IS AROUND. THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE SOME MORE PROCEDURAL TWISTS AND TURNS.BUT WE UNDERSTOOD NOW HOW THE TREATMENT OF THIS IS GOING TO END. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS GOING TO MAY TO DO WHATEVER IT WANTS TO DO. AND AFTER THAT, WILL CERTAINLY COME THE CHOICE ON WHETHER TO INDICT DONALD TRUMP. A CHOICE THAT WILL EVENTUALLY BE MADE BY CHIEF LAW OFFICER MERRICK GARLAND. HERE IS THE LINE AT THE END OF THE OPINION THAT TELLS YOU THAT THERE ' S REALLY ABSOLUTELY NOTHING MORE TO REVIEW PROCEDURALLY. POINT OF TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE A POSSESSORY INTEREST IN THE RECORDS MOOT, SO HE DOES NOT SUFFER COGNIZABLE HARM IF THE UNITED STATES ASSESSES DOCUMENTS HE NEITHER OWNS NOR HAS An INDIVIDUAL INTEREST IN. THEREFORE, AN INJUNCTION DELAYING, OR MAYBE PREVENTING, THE UNITED STATES IS CRIMINAL EXAMINATION FROM UTILIZING CLASSIFIED'PRODUCTS THREATS ENFORCING REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE ON THE UNITED STATES AND ALSO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. THE UNITED STATES LIKEWISE SUGGESTS THAT ALLOWING THE SPECIAL MASTER AS WELL AS COMPLAINANTS GUIDANCE TO CHECK OUT THE CLASSIFIED RECORDS WITH SEPARATELY IMPOSE.

As found on YouTube

Free Discount Prescription Drug Coupons

About Post Author

Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %
Tags:

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
FREE Prescription Drug Card HERE!